EcoService Models Library (ESML)
Home
Search EMs
My
EMs 
Learn about
ESML
View ESML Data Maploading
View Runs
: Simulating the Land Use and Carbon Storage for Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) under Multi-Scenarios in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area: Integration of Remote Sensing Data and the RF?Markov?CA?InVEST Model (EM-1023)
Back
Collapse All
Expand AllEM Identity and Description
EM Identification (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
EM Short Name
em.detail.shortNameHelp
?
|
RF–Markov–CA–InVEST model, China | * | * | * |
|
EM Full Name
em.detail.fullNameHelp
?
|
Simulating the Land Use and Carbon Storage for Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) under Multi-Scenarios in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area: Integration of Remote Sensing Data and the RF–Markov–CA–InVEST Model | * | * | * |
|
EM Source or Collection
em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp
?
|
InVEST | * | * | * |
|
EM Source Document ID
|
485 | * | * | * |
|
Document Author
em.detail.documentAuthorHelp
?
|
Li, G., Cheng, G., Liu, G., Chen, C. and He, Y. | * | * | * |
|
Document Year
em.detail.documentYearHelp
?
|
2023 | * | * | * |
|
Document Title
em.detail.sourceIdHelp
?
|
Simulating the land use and carbon storage for nature-based solutions (NbS) under multi-scenarios in the Three Gorges Reservoir area: Integration of remote sensing data and the rf–Markov–ca–InVEST model | * | * | * |
|
Document Status
em.detail.statusCategoryHelp
?
|
Peer reviewed and published | * | * | * |
|
Comments on Status
em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp
?
|
Published journal manuscript | * | * | * |
Software and Access (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
| Not applicable | * | * | * | |
|
Contact Name
em.detail.contactNameHelp
?
|
Guiyuan Li | * | * | * |
|
Contact Address
|
School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China | * | * | * |
|
Contact Email
|
lgy@hbut.edu.cn | * | * | * |
EM Description (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
Summary Description
em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp
?
|
Rapid industrialisation and urbanisation have moved contemporary civilization ahead but also deepened clashes with nature. Human society’s long-term evolution faces a number of serious problems, including the climate issue and frequent natural disasters. This research analyses the spatiotemporal evolution features of land use remote sensing data from 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020. Under the Nature-based Solutions (NbS) idea, four scenarios are established: Business as Usual (BAU), Woodland Conservation (WLC), Arable Land Conservation (ALC), and Urban Transformation and Development (UTD). The RF–Markov–CA model is used to simulate the spatiotemporal patterns of land use for the years 2025 and 2030. Furthermore, the InVEST model is utilised to assess and forecast the spatiotemporal evolution features of carbon storage. The findings show that (1) the primary land use categories in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) from 2005 to 2020 are arable land and woodland. Arable land has a declining tendency, whereas woodland has an increasing–decreasing trend. (2) The WLC scenario exhibits the greatest growth in woodland and the lowest drop in grassland from 2020 to 2030, indicating a more stable ecosystem. (3) The TGRA demonstrates substantial geographic variation in carbon storage from 2005 to 2030, with a broad distribution pattern of “higher in the north, lower in the south, higher in the east, lower in the west, with the reservoir head > reservoir centre > reservoir tail”. (4) In comparison to the other three scenarios, the WLC scenario sees a slower development of construction and arable land from 2020 to 2030, whereas the ecological land area rises the highest and carbon storage increases. As a result, the WLC scenario is the TGRA’s recommended development choice. The study’s findings have substantial implications for the TGRA’s ecological preservation and management, as well as for the optimisation of ecosystem carbon cycling and the promotion of regional sustainable development. | * | * | * |
|
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited
em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp
?
|
None provided | * | * | * |
|
Biophysical Context
|
Three Gorges Resevoir Area, Yangtze River | * | * | * |
|
EM Scenario Drivers
em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp
?
|
Business as usual (BAU) | Woodland conservation (WLC) | Arable Land Conservation (ALC) | Urban Transformation and Development (UTD) |
EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run
em.detail.methodOrAppHelp
?
|
Method + Application (multiple runs exist) | Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application | Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application | Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application |
|
New or Pre-existing EM?
em.detail.newOrExistHelp
?
|
New or revised model ?Comment:Although this model does use InVEST, which has been incorporated into the ESML, the combination of a Random Forest (RF), Cellular Automata (CA), Markov model, and InVEST is considered a new overall model in the context of this publication. |
Application of existing model ?Comment:Although this model does use InVEST, which has been incorporated into the ESML, the combination of a Random Forest (RF), Cellular Automata (CA), Markov model, and InVEST is considered a new overall model in the context of this publication. |
Application of existing model ?Comment:Although this model does use InVEST, which has been incorporated into the ESML, the combination of a Random Forest (RF), Cellular Automata (CA), Markov model, and InVEST is considered a new overall model in the context of this publication. |
Application of existing model ?Comment:Although this model does use InVEST, which has been incorporated into the ESML, the combination of a Random Forest (RF), Cellular Automata (CA), Markov model, and InVEST is considered a new overall model in the context of this publication. |
Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML
em.detail.relatedEmHelp
?
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
Document ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp
?
|
None | None | None | None |
|
EM ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp
?
|
EM-1024 | EM-1026 | EM-1025 | EM-1023 | EM-1026 | EM-1025 | EM-1026 | EM-1024 | EM-1023 | EM-1023 | EM-1024 | EM-1025 |
EM Modeling Approach
EM Relationship to Time (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
EM Temporal Extent
em.detail.tempExtentHelp
?
|
2005-2030 | * | * | * |
|
EM Time Dependence
em.detail.timeDependencyHelp
?
|
time-dependent | * | * | * |
|
EM Time Reference (Future/Past)
em.detail.futurePastHelp
?
|
both | * | * | * |
|
EM Time Continuity
em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp
?
|
discrete | * | * | * |
|
EM Temporal Grain Size Value
em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp
?
|
5 | * | * | * |
|
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit
em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp
?
|
Year | * | * | * |
EM spatial extent (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
Bounding Type
em.detail.boundingTypeHelp
?
|
Watershed/Catchment/HUC | * | * | * |
|
Spatial Extent Name
em.detail.extentNameHelp
?
|
Three Gorges Resevoir | * | * | * |
|
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude)
em.detail.extentAreaHelp
?
|
100,000-1,000,000 km^2 | * | * | * |
Spatial Distribution of Computations (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
EM Spatial Distribution
em.detail.distributeLumpHelp
?
|
spatially lumped (in all cases) | * | * | * |
|
Spatial Grain Type
em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * | * |
|
Spatial Grain Size
em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * | * |
EM Structure and Computation Approach (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
EM Computational Approach
em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp
?
|
Analytic | * | * | * |
|
EM Determinism
em.detail.deterStochHelp
?
|
deterministic | * | * | * |
|
Statistical Estimation of EM
em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp
?
|
|
* | * | * |
Model Checking Procedures Used (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
Model Calibration Reported?
em.detail.calibrationHelp
?
|
Unclear | * | * | * |
|
Model Goodness of Fit Reported?
em.detail.goodnessFitHelp
?
|
Yes | * | * | * |
|
Goodness of Fit (metric| value | unit)
em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp
?
|
|
* | * | * |
|
Model Operational Validation Reported?
em.detail.validationHelp
?
|
Unclear ?Comment:Model validation was performed on the intermediate variables in this study using past data, however the response variables, which are future projections, do not have a validation associated with them. |
* ?Comment:Model validation was performed on the intermediate variables in this study using past data, however the response variables, which are future projections, do not have a validation associated with them. |
* ?Comment:Model validation was performed on the intermediate variables in this study using past data, however the response variables, which are future projections, do not have a validation associated with them. |
* ?Comment:Model validation was performed on the intermediate variables in this study using past data, however the response variables, which are future projections, do not have a validation associated with them. |
|
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported?
em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp
?
|
Unclear | * | * | * |
|
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported?
em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp
?
|
Unclear | * | * | * |
|
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions?
em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * | * |
EM Locations, Environments, Ecology
Location of EM Application (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])
em.detail.relationToSpaceTerrestrialHelp
?
| EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
* | * | * |
Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)
em.detail.relationToSpaceMarineHelp
?
| EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
| None | * | * | * |
Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
Centroid Latitude
em.detail.ddLatHelp
?
|
30 | * | * | * |
|
Centroid Longitude
em.detail.ddLongHelp
?
|
109 | * | * | * |
|
Centroid Datum
em.detail.datumHelp
?
|
WGS84 | * | * | * |
|
Centroid Coordinates Status
em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp
?
|
Estimated | * | * | * |
Environments and Scales Modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
EM Environmental Sub-Class
em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp
?
|
Rivers and Streams | Forests | Agroecosystems | Grasslands | * | * | * |
|
Specific Environment Type
em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp
?
|
Watershed with urban development | * | * | * |
|
EM Ecological Scale
em.detail.ecoScaleHelp
?
|
Ecological scale corresponds to the Environmental Sub-class | * | * | * |
Organisms modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled
em.detail.nameOfOrgsOrGroupsHelp
?
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
EM Organismal Scale
em.detail.orgScaleHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * | * |
Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified
taxonomyHelp
?
| EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
| None Available | * | * | * |
EnviroAtlas URL
em.detail.enviroAtlasURLHelp
?
| EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
| Dasymetric Allocation of Population, Average Annual Precipitation, Ecosystem Markets: Imperiled Species and Habitats | Dasymetric Allocation of Population, Average Annual Precipitation, Ecosystem Markets: Imperiled Species and Habitats | Dasymetric Allocation of Population, Average Annual Precipitation, Ecosystem Markets: Imperiled Species and Habitats | Dasymetric Allocation of Population, Average Annual Precipitation, Ecosystem Markets: Imperiled Species and Habitats |
EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system
* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left
CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)
em.detail.cicesHelp
?
| EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
* | * | * |
(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)
fegs2Help
?
| EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
* | * | * |
EM Variable Names (and Units)
* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.
Predictor
em.detail.variablesPredictorHelp
?
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
Driving Variables (and Units)
em.detail.drivingVariableHelp
?
|
|
* | * | * |
|
Constant or Factor Variables (and Units)
em.detail.constantFactorVariableHelp
?
|
None | * | * | * |
Intermediate
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-1023 | Application of existing model | Application of existing model | Application of existing model |
|
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units)
em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp
?
|
* | * | * |
Response
em.detail.variablesResponseHelp
?