EcoService Models Library (ESML)
loading
View Runs
: InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Envl. Services and Tradeoffs) nutrient retention, Hood Canal, WA, USA (EM-112)
Back
Collapse All
Expand All
- Export Data to Spreadsheet (Free Viewers)
- View Variable Relationship Diagram (PDF)(1 pp, 80 KB, About PDF)
EM Identity and Description
EM Identification (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
EM Short Name
em.detail.shortNameHelp
?
|
InVEST nutrient retention, Hood Canal, WA, USA | * | * |
EM Full Name
em.detail.fullNameHelp
?
|
InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Envl. Services and Tradeoffs) nutrient retention, Hood Canal, WA, USA | * | * |
EM Source or Collection
em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp
?
|
InVEST | * | * |
EM Source Document ID
|
205 | * | * |
Document Author
em.detail.documentAuthorHelp
?
|
Toft, J. E., Burke, J. L., Carey, M. P., Kim, C. K., Marsik, M., Sutherland, D. A., Arkema, K. K., Guerry, A. D., Levin, P. S., Minello, T. J., Plummer, M., Ruckelshaus, M. H., and Townsend, H. M. | * | * |
Document Year
em.detail.documentYearHelp
?
|
2013 | * | * |
Document Title
em.detail.sourceIdHelp
?
|
From mountains to sound: modelling the sensitivity of dungeness crab and Pacific oyster to land–sea interactions in Hood Canal,WA | * | * |
Document Status
em.detail.statusCategoryHelp
?
|
Peer reviewed and published | * | * |
Comments on Status
em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp
?
|
Published journal manuscript | * | * |
Software and Access (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
https://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest/ | * | * | |
Contact Name
em.detail.contactNameHelp
?
|
J.E. Toft | * | * |
Contact Address
|
The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA | * | * |
Contact Email
|
jetoft@stanford.edu | * | * |
EM Description (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Summary Description
em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp
?
|
InVEST Nutrient Retention Model Please note: This ESML entry describes a specific, published application of an InVEST model. Different versions (e.g. different tiers) or more recent versions of this model may be available at the InVEST website. AUTHOR'S DESCRIPTION: "We modelled discharge and total nitrogen for the 153 perennial sub-watersheds in Hood Canal based on spatial variation in hydrological factors, land and water use, and vegetation.To do this, we reparameterized a set of fresh water models available in the InVEST tool (Tallis and Polasky, 2009; Kareiva et al., 2011)" (2) "We used the InVEST Nutrient Retention model to quantify the total nitrogen load for each subwatershed. Inputs to the Nutrient Retention model include water yield, land use and land cover, and nutrient loading and filtration rates (Table 1; Conte et al., 2011; Tallis et al., 2011). The nutrient model quantifies natural and anthropogenic sources of total nitrogen within each subwatershed, allowing managers to identify subwatersheds potentially at risk of contributing excessive nitrogen loads given the predicted development and climate future." ( P. 4) | InVEST Nutrient Retention Model Please note: This ESML entry describes a specific, published application of an InVEST model. Different versions (e.g. different tiers) or more recent versions of this model may be available at the InVEST website. AUTHOR'S DESCRIPTION: "We modelled discharge and total nitrogen for the 153 perennial sub- watersheds in Hood Canal based on spatial variation in hydrological factors, land and water use, and vegetation.To do this, we reparame-terized a set of fresh water models available in the InVEST tool (Tallis and Polasky, 2009; Kareiva et al., 2011)" (2) "We used the InVEST Nutrient Retention model to quantify the total nitrogen load for each subwatershed. Inputs to the Nutrient Retention model include water yield, land use and land cover, and nutrient loading and filtration rates (Table 1; Conte et al., 2011; Tallis et al., 2011). The nutrient model quantifies natural and an- thropogenic sources of total nitrogen within each subwatershed, allowing managers to identify subwatersheds potentially at risk of contributing excessive nitrogen loads given the predicted develop- ment and climate future." ( P. 4) | InVEST Nutrient Retention Model Please note: This ESML entry describes a specific, published application of an InVEST model. Different versions (e.g. different tiers) or more recent versions of this model may be available at the InVEST website. AUTHOR'S DESCRIPTION: "We modelled discharge and total nitrogen for the 153 perennial sub- watersheds in Hood Canal based on spatial variation in hydrological factors, land and water use, and vegetation.To do this, we reparame-terized a set of fresh water models available in the InVEST tool (Tallis and Polasky, 2009; Kareiva et al., 2011)" (2) "We used the InVEST Nutrient Retention model to quantify the total nitrogen load for each subwatershed. Inputs to the Nutrient Retention model include water yield, land use and land cover, and nutrient loading and filtration rates (Table 1; Conte et al., 2011; Tallis et al., 2011). The nutrient model quantifies natural and an- thropogenic sources of total nitrogen within each subwatershed, allowing managers to identify subwatersheds potentially at risk of contributing excessive nitrogen loads given the predicted develop- ment and climate future." ( P. 4) |
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited
em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp
?
|
Land use change | * | * |
Biophysical Context
|
No additional description provided | * | * |
EM Scenario Drivers
em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp
?
|
Future land use and land cover; climate change | * | * |
EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run
em.detail.methodOrAppHelp
?
|
Method + Application (multiple runs exist) | Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application | Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application |
New or Pre-existing EM?
em.detail.newOrExistHelp
?
|
Application of existing model | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML
em.detail.relatedEmHelp
?
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Document ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp
?
|
Doc-309 | Doc-338 | None | None |
EM ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp
?
|
EM-363 | EM-438 | None | None |
EM Modeling Approach
EM Relationship to Time (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
EM Temporal Extent
em.detail.tempExtentHelp
?
|
2005-7; 2035-45 | 2005-2007; 2035-2045 | 2005-2007; 2035-2045 |
EM Time Dependence
em.detail.timeDependencyHelp
?
|
time-stationary | * | * |
EM Time Reference (Future/Past)
em.detail.futurePastHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * |
EM Time Continuity
em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * |
EM Temporal Grain Size Value
em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * |
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit
em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * |
EM spatial extent (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Bounding Type
em.detail.boundingTypeHelp
?
|
Watershed/Catchment/HUC | * | * |
Spatial Extent Name
em.detail.extentNameHelp
?
|
Hood Canal | * | * |
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude)
em.detail.extentAreaHelp
?
|
100,000-1,000,000 km^2 | 10,000-100,000 km^2 | 10,000-100,000 km^2 |
Spatial Distribution of Computations (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
EM Spatial Distribution
em.detail.distributeLumpHelp
?
|
spatially distributed (in at least some cases) | * | * |
Spatial Grain Type
em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp
?
|
area, for pixel or radial feature | * | * |
Spatial Grain Size
em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp
?
|
30 m x 30 m | * | * |
EM Structure and Computation Approach (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
EM Computational Approach
em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp
?
|
Other or unclear (comment) | * | * |
EM Determinism
em.detail.deterStochHelp
?
|
deterministic | * | * |
Statistical Estimation of EM
em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp
?
|
|
* | * |
Model Checking Procedures Used (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Model Calibration Reported?
em.detail.calibrationHelp
?
|
Yes | * | * |
Model Goodness of Fit Reported?
em.detail.goodnessFitHelp
?
|
No | * | * |
Goodness of Fit (metric| value | unit)
em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp
?
|
None | * | * |
Model Operational Validation Reported?
em.detail.validationHelp
?
|
Yes | * | * |
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported?
em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp
?
|
No | * | * |
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported?
em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp
?
|
Yes | * | * |
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions?
em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp
?
|
No | * | * |
EM Locations, Environments, Ecology
Location of EM Application (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])
em.detail.relationToSpaceTerrestrialHelp
?
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
|
* | * |
Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)
em.detail.relationToSpaceMarineHelp
?
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
|
* | * |
Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Centroid Latitude
em.detail.ddLatHelp
?
|
47.8 | * | * |
Centroid Longitude
em.detail.ddLongHelp
?
|
-122.7 | * | * |
Centroid Datum
em.detail.datumHelp
?
|
WGS84 | * | * |
Centroid Coordinates Status
em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp
?
|
Estimated | * | * |
Environments and Scales Modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
EM Environmental Sub-Class
em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp
?
|
Near Coastal Marine and Estuarine | * | * |
Specific Environment Type
em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp
?
|
glacier-carved saltwater fjord | * | * |
EM Ecological Scale
em.detail.ecoScaleHelp
?
|
Ecological scale is finer than that of the Environmental Sub-class | * | * |
Organisms modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)
Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled
em.detail.nameOfOrgsOrGroupsHelp
?
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
EM Organismal Scale
em.detail.orgScaleHelp
?
|
Not applicable | * | * |
Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified
taxonomyHelp
?
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
None Available | * | * |
EnviroAtlas URL
em.detail.enviroAtlasURLHelp
?
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Total Annual Reduced Nitrogen Deposition, Total Annual Nitrogen Deposition | None Available | None Available |
EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system
* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left
CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)
em.detail.cicesHelp
?
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
|
|
|
(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)
fegs2Help
?
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
None | * | * |
EM Variable Names (and Units)
* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.
Predictor
em.detail.variablesPredictorHelp
?
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Driving Variables (and Units)
em.detail.drivingVariableHelp
?
|
|||
Constant or Factor Variables (and Units)
em.detail.constantFactorVariableHelp
?
|
None | * | * |
Intermediate
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units)
em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp
?
|
None | * | * |
Response
em.detail.variablesResponseHelp
?
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-112 | Current state- Base scenario | Land Use Change Scenario |
Observed Response Variables (and Units)
em.detail.observedResponseHelp
?
|
None | * | * |
Computed Response Variables (and Units)
em.detail.computedResponseHelp
?
|