{PAGE NAME} | {WEB AREA NAME}

EM Identity and Description

EM Identification (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
EM Short Name em.detail.shortNameHelp ?	Yasso07 - Land use SOC dynamics, China	Yasso07 - Land use SOC dynamics, China	Yasso07 - Land use SOC dynamics, China	Yasso07 - Land use SOC dynamics, China	Yasso07 - Land use SOC dynamics, China
EM Full Name em.detail.fullNameHelp ?	Yasso07 - Land use dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon in the Loess Plateau, China	*	*	*	*
EM Source or Collection em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp ?	None	*	*	*	*
EM Source Document ID	344	*	*	*	*
Document Author em.detail.documentAuthorHelp ?	Wu, Xing, Akujarvi, A., Lu, N., Liski, J., Liu, G., Want, Y, Holmberg, M., Li, F., Zeng, Y., and B. Fu	*	*	*	*
Document Year em.detail.documentYearHelp ?	2015	*	*	*	*
Document Title em.detail.sourceIdHelp ?	Dynamics of soil organic carbon stock in a typical catchment of the Loess Plateau: comparison of model simulations with measurement	*	*	*	*
Document Status em.detail.statusCategoryHelp ?	Peer reviewed and published	*	*	*	*
Comments on Status em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp ?	Published journal manuscript	*	*	*	*

Software and Access (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
EM Software Access info Exit em.detail.modelAccessInformationHelp ?	http://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/yasso-download-and-support	*	*	*	*
Contact Name em.detail.contactNameHelp ?	Xing Wu	*	*	*	*
Contact Address	Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China	*	*	*	*
Contact Email	xingwu@rceesac.cn	*	*	*	*

EM Description (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Summary Description em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp ?	ABSTRACT: "Land use changes are known to significantly affect the soil C balance by altering both C inputs and losses. Since the late 1990s, a large area of the Loess Plateau has undergone intensive land use changes during several ecological restoration projects to control soil erosion and combat land degradation, especially in the Grain for Green project. By using remote sensing techniques and the Yasso07 model, we simulated the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in the Yangjuangou catchment of the Loess Plateau. The performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the simulated results with the intensive field measurements in 2006 and 2011 throughout the catchment. SOC stocks and NPP values of all land use types had generally increased during our study period. The average SOC sequestration rate in the upper 30 cm soil from 2006 to 2011 in the Yangjuangou catchment was approximately 44 g C m-2 yr-1, which was comparable to other studies in the Loess Plateau. Forest and grassland showed a more effective accumulation of SOC than the other land use types in our study area. The Yasso07 model performed reasonably well in predicting the overall dynamics of SOC stock for different land use change types at both the site and catchment scales. The assessment of the model performance indicated that the combination of Yasso07 model and remote sensing data could be used for simulating the effect of land use changes on SOC stock at catchment scale in the Loess Plateau."	ABSTRACT: "Land use changes are known to significantly affect the soil C balance by altering both C inputs and losses. Since the late 1990s, a large area of the Loess Plateau has undergone intensive land use changes during several ecological restoration projects to control soil erosion and combat land degradation, especially in the Grain for Green project. By using remote sensing techniques and the Yasso07 model, we simulated the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in the Yangjuangou catchment of the Loess Plateau. The performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the simulated results with the intensive field measurements in 2006 and 2011 throughout the catchment. SOC stocks and NPP values of all land use types had generally increased during our study period. The average SOC sequestration rate in the upper 30 cm soil from 2006 to 2011 in the Yangjuangou catchment was approximately 44 g C m-2 yr-1, which was comparable to other studies in the Loess Plateau. Forest and grassland showed a more effective accumulation of SOC than the other land use types in our study area. The Yasso07 model performed reasonably well in predicting the overall dynamics of SOC stock for different land use change types at both the site and catchment scales. The assessment of the model performance indicated that the combination of Yasso07 model and remote sensing data could be used for simulating the effect of land use changes on SOC stock at catchment scale in the Loess Plateau."	ABSTRACT: "Land use changes are known to significantly affect the soil C balance by altering both C inputs and losses. Since the late 1990s, a large area of the Loess Plateau has undergone intensive land use changes during several ecological restoration projects to control soil erosion and combat land degradation, especially in the Grain for Green project. By using remote sensing techniques and the Yasso07 model, we simulated the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in the Yangjuangou catchment of the Loess Plateau. The performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the simulated results with the intensive field measurements in 2006 and 2011 throughout the catchment. SOC stocks and NPP values of all land use types had generally increased during our study period. The average SOC sequestration rate in the upper 30 cm soil from 2006 to 2011 in the Yangjuangou catchment was approximately 44 g C m-2 yr-1, which was comparable to other studies in the Loess Plateau. Forest and grassland showed a more effective accumulation of SOC than the other land use types in our study area. The Yasso07 model performed reasonably well in predicting the overall dynamics of SOC stock for different land use change types at both the site and catchment scales. The assessment of the model performance indicated that the combination of Yasso07 model and remote sensing data could be used for simulating the effect of land use changes on SOC stock at catchment scale in the Loess Plateau."	ABSTRACT: "Land use changes are known to significantly affect the soil C balance by altering both C inputs and losses. Since the late 1990s, a large area of the Loess Plateau has undergone intensive land use changes during several ecological restoration projects to control soil erosion and combat land degradation, especially in the Grain for Green project. By using remote sensing techniques and the Yasso07 model, we simulated the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in the Yangjuangou catchment of the Loess Plateau. The performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the simulated results with the intensive field measurements in 2006 and 2011 throughout the catchment. SOC stocks and NPP values of all land use types had generally increased during our study period. The average SOC sequestration rate in the upper 30 cm soil from 2006 to 2011 in the Yangjuangou catchment was approximately 44 g C m-2 yr-1, which was comparable to other studies in the Loess Plateau. Forest and grassland showed a more effective accumulation of SOC than the other land use types in our study area. The Yasso07 model performed reasonably well in predicting the overall dynamics of SOC stock for different land use change types at both the site and catchment scales. The assessment of the model performance indicated that the combination of Yasso07 model and remote sensing data could be used for simulating the effect of land use changes on SOC stock at catchment scale in the Loess Plateau."	ABSTRACT: "Land use changes are known to significantly affect the soil C balance by altering both C inputs and losses. Since the late 1990s, a large area of the Loess Plateau has undergone intensive land use changes during several ecological restoration projects to control soil erosion and combat land degradation, especially in the Grain for Green project. By using remote sensing techniques and the Yasso07 model, we simulated the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in the Yangjuangou catchment of the Loess Plateau. The performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the simulated results with the intensive field measurements in 2006 and 2011 throughout the catchment. SOC stocks and NPP values of all land use types had generally increased during our study period. The average SOC sequestration rate in the upper 30 cm soil from 2006 to 2011 in the Yangjuangou catchment was approximately 44 g C m-2 yr-1, which was comparable to other studies in the Loess Plateau. Forest and grassland showed a more effective accumulation of SOC than the other land use types in our study area. The Yasso07 model performed reasonably well in predicting the overall dynamics of SOC stock for different land use change types at both the site and catchment scales. The assessment of the model performance indicated that the combination of Yasso07 model and remote sensing data could be used for simulating the effect of land use changes on SOC stock at catchment scale in the Loess Plateau."
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp ?	None identified	*	*	*	*
Biophysical Context	Agricultural plain, hills, gulleys, forest, grassland, Central China	*	*	*	*
EM Scenario Drivers em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp ?	Land use change	*	*	*	*

EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run em.detail.methodOrAppHelp ?	Method + Application (multiple runs exist)	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application
New or Pre-existing EM? em.detail.newOrExistHelp ?	Application of existing model	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest

Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Document ID for related EM em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp ?	Doc-343 \| Doc-342	Doc-343	Doc-343	Doc-343	Doc-343
EM ID for related EM em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp ?	EM-466 \| EM-467 \| EM-469 \| EM-485	None	None	None	None

EM Modeling Approach

EM Relationship to Time (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
EM Temporal Extent em.detail.tempExtentHelp ?	1969-2011	*	*	*	*
EM Time Dependence em.detail.timeDependencyHelp ?	time-dependent	*	*	*	*
EM Time Reference (Future/Past) em.detail.futurePastHelp ?	past time	*	*	*	*
EM Time Continuity em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp ?	discrete	*	*	*	*
EM Temporal Grain Size Value em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp ?	1	*	*	*	*
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp ?	Year	*	*	*	*

EM spatial extent (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Bounding Type em.detail.boundingTypeHelp ?	Watershed/Catchment/HUC	*	*	*	*
Spatial Extent Name em.detail.extentNameHelp ?	Yangjuangou catchment	*	*	*	*
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude) em.detail.extentAreaHelp ?	1-10 km^2	*	*	*	*

Spatial Distribution of Computations (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
EM Spatial Distribution em.detail.distributeLumpHelp ?	spatially distributed (in at least some cases)	*	*	*	*
Spatial Grain Type em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp ?	area, for pixel or radial feature	*	*	*	*
Spatial Grain Size em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp ?	30m x 30m	*	*	*	*

EM Structure and Computation Approach (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
EM Computational Approach em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp ?	Numeric	*	*	*	*
EM Determinism em.detail.deterStochHelp ?	deterministic	*	*	*	*
Statistical Estimation of EM em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp ?	Conventional (frequentist) statistics	*	*	*	*

Model Checking Procedures Used (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Model Calibration Reported? em.detail.calibrationHelp ?	No	*	*	*	*
Model Goodness of Fit Reported? em.detail.goodnessFitHelp ?	Yes ? Comment: p value: p<0.001	* ? Comment: p value <0.05	* ? Comment: pvalue <0.05	* ? Comment: p value <0.05	*
Goodness of Fit (metric\| value \| unit) em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp ?	R squared \| 0.219 \| unitless	R squared \| 0.703 \| unitless	R squared \| 0.785 \| unitless	R squared \| 0.195 \| unitless	R squared \| 0.147 \| unitless
Model Operational Validation Reported? em.detail.validationHelp ?	No	*	*	*	*
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported? em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp ?	No	*	*	*	*
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported? em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp ?	No	*	*	*	*
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions? em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*	*

EM Locations, Environments, Ecology

Location of EM Application (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])

EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Asia China	*	*	*	*

Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)

EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
None	*	*	*	*

Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Centroid Latitude em.detail.ddLatHelp ?	36.7	*	*	*	*
Centroid Longitude em.detail.ddLongHelp ?	109.52	*	*	*	*
Centroid Datum em.detail.datumHelp ?	WGS84	*	*	*	*
Centroid Coordinates Status em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp ?	Provided	*	*	*	*

Environments and Scales Modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
EM Environmental Sub-Class em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp ?	Agroecosystems	Terrestrial Environment (sub-classes not fully specified) \| Agroecosystems	Terrestrial Environment (sub-classes not fully specified) \| Agroecosystems	Terrestrial Environment (sub-classes not fully specified) \| Agroecosystems	Terrestrial Environment (sub-classes not fully specified) \| Agroecosystems
Specific Environment Type em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp ?	Loess plain	*	*	*	*
EM Ecological Scale em.detail.ecoScaleHelp ?	Ecological scale is finer than that of the Environmental Sub-class	*	*	*	*

Organisms modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
EM Organismal Scale em.detail.orgScaleHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*	*

Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified

EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
None Available	*	*	*	*

EnviroAtlas URL

EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Average Annual Precipitation, Carbon storage by tree biomass (kg/m2), Carbon Storage by Tree Biomass	None Available	None Available	None Available	None Available

EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system

* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left

CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)

EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
[Ecosystem] Regulation & Maintenance Maintenance of physical, chemical, biological conditions Atmospheric composition and climate regulation Micro and regional climate regulation Global climate regulation by reduction of greenhouse gas concentrations	*	*	*	*

National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS) Plus

(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)

EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
None	*	*	*	*

EM Variable Names (and Units)

* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.

To view run information for variables, select any variable below or view run data for all variables.

Predictor

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Driving Variables (and Units) em.detail.drivingVariableHelp ?	Estimated transpiration (Not reported) Land use (Not applicable) Light use efficiency (maximum) (g C MJ^-1) Litter type (Not applicable) Potential evapotranspiration (Not reported) Precipitation (mm) Temperature (air) (°C)	Estimated transpiration (Not reported) Land use (Not applicable) Light use efficiency (maximum) (g C MJ^-1) Litter type (Not applicable) Potential evapotranspiration (Not reported) Precipitation (mm) Temperature (air) (°C)	Estimated transpiration (Not reported) Land use (Not applicable) Light use efficiency (maximum) (g C MJ^-1) Litter type (Not applicable) Potential evapotranspiration (Not reported) Precipitation (mm) Temperature (air) (°C)	Estimated transpiration (Not reported) Land use (Not applicable) Light use efficiency (maximum) (g C MJ^-1) Litter type (Not applicable) Potential evapotranspiration (Not reported) Precipitation (mm) Temperature (air) (°C)	Estimated transpiration (Not reported) Land use (Not applicable) Light use efficiency (maximum) (g C MJ^-1) Litter type (Not applicable) Potential evapotranspiration (Not reported) Precipitation (mm) Temperature (air) (°C)
Constant or Factor Variables (and Units) em.detail.constantFactorVariableHelp ?	Decomposition rate (A) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (E) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (N) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (W) (Not reported) Diameter of woody liter (Not reported) Fraction of non-woody litter (%) Harvest (%) Initial carbon stock (by land use) (Not reported) Mass flow from A to E (Not reported) Mass flow from A to N (Not reported) Mass flow from A to W (Not reported) Mass flow from A, W, E, N to humus (Not reported) Mass flow from E to A (Not reported) Mass flow from E to N (Not reported) Mass flow from E to W (Not reported) Mass flow from N to A (Not reported) Mass flow from N to E (Not reported) Mass flow from N to W (Not reported) Mass flow from W to A (Not reported) Mass flow from W to E (Not reported) Mass flow from W to N (Not reported) Ratio of above ground net primary production to below ground net primary production (unitless) Size class (wood) (Not applicable) Size dependence parameter (woody litter) (cm) Soil carbon input (mass) (Not reported) Soil carbon input compounds hydrolysable in acid (A compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds neither soluble nor hydrolysable (N compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in a non-polar solvent, ethanol or dichloromethane (E compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in water (W compartment) (%) Soil carbon input humus (H compartment) (%) Turnover rate (above ground biomass) (yr^-1) Turnover rate (below ground biomass) (yr^-1)	Decomposition rate (A) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (E) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (N) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (W) (Not reported) Diameter of woody liter (cm) Fraction of non-woody litter (%) Harvest (%) Initial carbon stock (by land use) (Not reported) Mass flow from A to E (Not reported) Mass flow from A to N (Not reported) Mass flow from A to W (Not reported) Mass flow from A, W, E, N to humus (Not reported) Mass flow from E to A (Not reported) Mass flow from E to N (Not reported) Mass flow from E to W (Not reported) Mass flow from N to A (Not reported) Mass flow from N to E (Not reported) Mass flow from N to W (Not reported) Mass flow from W to A (Not reported) Mass flow from W to E (Not reported) Mass flow from W to N (Not reported) Ratio of above ground net primary production to below ground net primary production (unitless) Size class (wood) (Not applicable) Size dependence parameter (woody litter) (cm) Soil carbon input (mass) (Not reported) Soil carbon input compounds hydrolysable in acid (A compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds neither soluble nor hydrolysable (N compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in a non-polar solvent, ethanol or dichloromethane (E compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in water (W compartment) (%) Soil carbon input humus (H compartment) (%) Turnover rate (above ground biomass) (yr^-1) Turnover rate (below ground biomass) (yr^-1)	Decomposition rate (A) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (E) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (N) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (W) (Not reported) Diameter of woody liter (cm) Fraction of non-woody litter (%) Harvest (%) Initial carbon stock (by land use) (Not reported) Mass flow from A to E (Not reported) Mass flow from A to N (Not reported) Mass flow from A to W (Not reported) Mass flow from A, W, E, N to humus (Not reported) Mass flow from E to A (Not reported) Mass flow from E to N (Not reported) Mass flow from E to W (Not reported) Mass flow from N to A (Not reported) Mass flow from N to E (Not reported) Mass flow from N to W (Not reported) Mass flow from W to A (Not reported) Mass flow from W to E (Not reported) Mass flow from W to N (Not reported) Ratio of above ground net primary production to below ground net primary production (unitless) Size class (wood) (Not applicable) Size dependence parameter (woody litter) (cm) Soil carbon input (mass) (Not reported) Soil carbon input compounds hydrolysable in acid (A compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds neither soluble nor hydrolysable (N compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in a non-polar solvent, ethanol or dichloromethane (E compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in water (W compartment) (%) Soil carbon input humus (H compartment) (%) Turnover rate (above ground biomass) (yr^-1) Turnover rate (below ground biomass) (yr^-1)	Above ground carbon pool per LULC (unitless) Decomposition rate (A) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (E) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (N) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (W) (Not reported) Diameter of woody liter (cm) Fraction of non-woody litter (%) Harvest (%) Initial carbon stock (by land use) (Not reported) Mass flow from A to E (Not reported) Mass flow from A to N (Not reported) Mass flow from A to W (Not reported) Mass flow from A, W, E, N to humus (Not reported) Mass flow from E to A (Not reported) Mass flow from E to N (Not reported) Mass flow from E to W (Not reported) Mass flow from N to A (Not reported) Mass flow from N to E (Not reported) Mass flow from N to W (Not reported) Mass flow from W to A (Not reported) Mass flow from W to E (Not reported) Mass flow from W to N (Not reported) Ratio of above ground net primary production to below ground net primary production (unitless) Size class (wood) (Not applicable) Size dependence parameter (woody litter) (cm) Soil carbon input (mass) (Not reported) Soil carbon input compounds hydrolysable in acid (A compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds neither soluble nor hydrolysable (N compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in a non-polar solvent, ethanol or dichloromethane (E compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in water (W compartment) (%) Soil carbon input humus (H compartment) (%) Turnover rate (above ground biomass) (yr^-1) Turnover rate (below ground biomass) (yr^-1)	Decomposition rate (A) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (E) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (N) (Not reported) Decomposition rate (W) (Not reported) Diameter of woody liter (cm) Fraction of non-woody litter (%) Harvest (%) Initial carbon stock (by land use) (Not reported) Mass flow from A to E (Not reported) Mass flow from A to N (Not reported) Mass flow from A to W (Not reported) Mass flow from A, W, E, N to humus (Not reported) Mass flow from E to A (Not reported) Mass flow from E to N (Not reported) Mass flow from E to W (Not reported) Mass flow from N to A (Not reported) Mass flow from N to E (Not reported) Mass flow from N to W (Not reported) Mass flow from W to A (Not reported) Mass flow from W to E (Not reported) Mass flow from W to N (Not reported) Ratio of above ground net primary production to below ground net primary production (unitless) Size class (wood) (Not applicable) Size dependence parameter (woody litter) (cm) Soil carbon input (mass) (Not reported) Soil carbon input compounds hydrolysable in acid (A compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds neither soluble nor hydrolysable (N compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in a non-polar solvent, ethanol or dichloromethane (E compartment) (%) Soil carbon input compounds soluble in water (W compartment) (%) Soil carbon input humus (H compartment) (%) Turnover rate (above ground biomass) (yr^-1) Turnover rate (below ground biomass) (yr^-1)

Intermediate

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units) em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp ?	Estimated net primary production (g C m^-2) Light use efficiency (g C MJ^-1) Photosynthetically active radiation absorbed (by green vegetation) (Not reported) Variation in temperature amplitude (°C) Water scalar (W) (Not applicable)	Estimated net primary production (g C m^-2) Light use efficiency (g C MJ^-1) Photosynthetically active radiation absorbed (by green vegetation) (Not reported) Variation in temperature amplitude (°C) Water scalar (W) (Not applicable)	Estimated net primary production (g C m^-2) Light use efficiency (g C MJ^-1) Photosynthetically active radiation absorbed (by green vegetation) (Not reported) Variation in temperature amplitude (°C) Water scalar (W) (Not applicable)	Estimated net primary production (g C m^-2) Light use efficiency (g C MJ^-1) Photosynthetically active radiation absorbed (by green vegetation) (Not reported) Variation in temperature amplitude (°C) Water scalar (W) (Not applicable)	Estimated net primary production (g C m^-2) Light use efficiency (g C MJ^-1) Photosynthetically active radiation absorbed (by green vegetation) (Not reported) Variation in temperature amplitude (°C) Water scalar (W) (Not applicable)

Response

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-480	Grassland to shrubland	Cropland-shrub to orchard	No landcover change	Grass-shrub to forest
Observed Response Variables (and Units) em.detail.observedResponseHelp ?	SOC (measured) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)	SOC (measured) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)	SOC (measured) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)	SOC (measured) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)	SOC (measured) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)
Computed Response Variables (and Units) em.detail.computedResponseHelp ?	Humus (Not reported) NPP (SOC) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)	Humus (Not reported) NPP (SOC) (kg C m^-1 yr^-1)	Humus (Not reported) NPP (SOC) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)	Humus (Not reported) NPP (SOC) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)	Humus (Not reported) NPP (SOC) (kg C m^-2 yr^-1)

US EPA

EcoService Models Library (ESML)

View Runs

: Yasso07 - Land use dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon in the Loess Plateau, China (EM-480)

EM Identity and Description

Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML

EM Modeling Approach

Comment:

Comment:

Comment:

Comment:

EM Locations, Environments, Ecology

Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])

Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)

Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)

Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled

Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified

EnviroAtlas URL

EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system

* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left

CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)

National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS) Plus

(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)

EM Variable Names (and Units)

* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.

Predictor

Intermediate

Response