{PAGE NAME} | {WEB AREA NAME}

EM Identity and Description

EM Identification (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
EM Short Name em.detail.shortNameHelp ?	Arthropod flower preference, CA, USA	*	*	*
EM Full Name em.detail.fullNameHelp ?	Arthropod flower type preference, California, USA	Arthropod flower type preference, Ca, USA	Arthropod flower type preference, Ca, USA	Arthropod flower type preference, Ca, USA
EM Source or Collection em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp ?	None	*	*	*
EM Source Document ID	399	*	*	*
Document Author em.detail.documentAuthorHelp ?	Lundin, O., Ward, K.L., and N.M. Williams	*	*	*
Document Year em.detail.documentYearHelp ?	2018	*	*	*
Document Title em.detail.sourceIdHelp ?	Indentifying native plants for coordinated hanbitat manegement of arthroppod pollinators, herbivores and natural enemies	*	*	*
Document Status em.detail.statusCategoryHelp ?	Peer reviewed and published	*	*	*
Comments on Status em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp ?	Published journal manuscript	*	*	*

Software and Access (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
EM Software Access info Exit em.detail.modelAccessInformationHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Contact Name em.detail.contactNameHelp ?	Ola Lundin	*	*	*
Contact Address	Department of Ecology, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden	*	*	*
Contact Email	ola.lundin@slu.se	*	*	*

EM Description (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Summary Description em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp ?	ABSTRACT: " Plant species differed in attractiveness for each arthropod functional group. Floral area of the focal plant species positively affected honeybee, predator, and parasitic wasp attractiveness. Later bloom period was associated with lower numbers of parasitic wasps. Flower type (actinomorphic, composite, or zygomorphic) predicted attractiveness for honeybees, which preferred actinomorphic over composite flowers and for parasitic wasps, which preferred composite flowers over actinomorphic flowers. 4. Across plant species, herbivore, predator, and parasitic wasp abundances were positively correlated, and honeybee abundance correlated negatively to herbivore abundance. 5. Synthesis and applications. We use data from our common garden experiment to inform evidence-based selection of plants that support pollinators and natural enemies without enhancing potential pests. We recommend selecting plant species with a high floral area per ground area unit, as this metric predicts the abundances of several groups of beneficial arthropods. Multiple correlations between functionally important arthropod groups across plant species stress the importance of a multifunctional approach to arthropod habitat management. " Changes in arthropod abundance were estimated for flower type (entered as separate runs); Actinomorphic, Composite, Zygomorphic. 43 plant species evaluated included Amsinckia intermedia, Calandrinia menziesii, Nemophila maculata, Nemophila menziesii, Phacelia ciliata, Achillea millefolium, Collinsia heterophylla, Fagopyrum esculentum, Lasthenia fremontii, Lasthenia glabrata, Limnanthes alba, Lupinus microcarpus densiflorus, Lupinus succelentus, Phacelia californica, Phacelia campanularia, Phacelia tanacetifolia, Salvia columbariae, Sphaeralcea ambigua, Trifolium fucatum, Trifolium gracilentum, Antirrhinum conutum, Clarkia purpurea, Clarkia unguiculata, Clarkia williamsonii, Eriophyllum lanatum, Eschscholzia californica, Monardella villosa, Scrophularia californica, Asclepia eriocarpa, Asclepia fascicularis, Camissoniopsis Cheiranthifolia, Eriogonum fasciculatum, Gilia capitata, Grindelia camporum, Helianthus annuus, Lupinus formosus, Malacothrix saxatilis, Oenothera elata, Helianthus bolanderi, Helianthus californicus, Madia elegans, Trichostema lanceolatum, Heterotheca grandiflora."	*	*	*
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp ?	None reported	*	*	*
Biophysical Context	Mediteranean climate	*	*	*
EM Scenario Drivers em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp ?	Arthropod groups	*	*	*

EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run em.detail.methodOrAppHelp ?	Method + Application (multiple runs exist)	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application
New or Pre-existing EM? em.detail.newOrExistHelp ?	New or revised model	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type

Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Document ID for related EM em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp ?	None	None	None	None
EM ID for related EM em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp ?	None	None	None	None

EM Modeling Approach

EM Relationship to Time (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
EM Temporal Extent em.detail.tempExtentHelp ?	2015-2016	*	*	*
EM Time Dependence em.detail.timeDependencyHelp ?	time-stationary	*	*	*
EM Time Reference (Future/Past) em.detail.futurePastHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
EM Time Continuity em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
EM Temporal Grain Size Value em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*

EM spatial extent (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Bounding Type em.detail.boundingTypeHelp ?	Point or points	*	*	*
Spatial Extent Name em.detail.extentNameHelp ?	Harry Laidlaw Jr. Honey Bee Research facility	*	*	*
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude) em.detail.extentAreaHelp ?	<1 ha	*	*	*

Spatial Distribution of Computations (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
EM Spatial Distribution em.detail.distributeLumpHelp ?	spatially lumped (in all cases)	*	*	*
Spatial Grain Type em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Spatial Grain Size em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*

EM Structure and Computation Approach (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
EM Computational Approach em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp ?	Numeric	*	*	*
EM Determinism em.detail.deterStochHelp ?	deterministic	*	*	*
Statistical Estimation of EM em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp ?	Conventional (frequentist) statistics	*	*	*

Model Checking Procedures Used (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Model Calibration Reported? em.detail.calibrationHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Model Goodness of Fit Reported? em.detail.goodnessFitHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Goodness of Fit (metric\| value \| unit) em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp ?	None	*	*	*
Model Operational Validation Reported? em.detail.validationHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported? em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp ?	No	*	*	*
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported? em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp ?	No	*	*	*
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions? em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*

EM Locations, Environments, Ecology

Location of EM Application (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])

EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
North America United States California	*	*	*

Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)

EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
None	*	*	*

Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Centroid Latitude em.detail.ddLatHelp ?	38.54	*	*	*
Centroid Longitude em.detail.ddLongHelp ?	-121.79	*	*	*
Centroid Datum em.detail.datumHelp ?	WGS84	*	*	*
Centroid Coordinates Status em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp ?	Provided	*	*	*

Environments and Scales Modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
EM Environmental Sub-Class em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp ?	Agroecosystems	*	*	*
Specific Environment Type em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp ?	Agricultural fields	*	*	*
EM Ecological Scale em.detail.ecoScaleHelp ?	Ecological scale corresponds to the Environmental Sub-class	*	*	*

Organisms modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
EM Organismal Scale em.detail.orgScaleHelp ?	Guild or Assemblage	*	*	*

Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified

EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
other Honey bees Predators Wild bees Herbivores Parasitic wasps	*	*	*

EnviroAtlas URL

EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
GAP Ecological Systems	GAP Ecological Systems	GAP Ecological Systems	GAP Ecological Systems

EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system

* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left

CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)

EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
[Ecosystem] Regulation & Maintenance Maintenance of physical, chemical, biological conditions Lifecycle maintenance, habitat and gene pool protection Pollination and seed dispersal	*	*	*

National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS) Plus

(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)

EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Agroecosystems (22) Fauna (4) Pollinators Stock Indicator	*	*	*

EM Variable Names (and Units)

* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.

To view run information for variables, select any variable below or view run data for all variables.

Predictor

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Driving Variables (and Units) em.detail.drivingVariableHelp ?	None	*	*	*
Constant or Factor Variables (and Units) em.detail.constantFactorVariableHelp ?	Flower type (Not applicable)	*	*	*

Intermediate

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units) em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp ?	None	*	*	*

Response

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-779	New or revised model	Composite flower type	Zygomorphic flower type
Observed Response Variables (and Units) em.detail.observedResponseHelp ?	Herbivores (No. ind./30 sec.) Honey bees (No. ind./60 sec.) Parasitic wasps (No. ind./30 sec.) Predators (No. ind./30 sec.) Wild bees (No. ind./60 sec.)	Herbivores (No. ind./30 sec.) Honey bees (No. ind./60 sec.) Parasitic wasps (No. ind./30 sec.) Predators (No. ind./30 sec.) Wild bees (No. ind./60 sec.)	Herbivores (No. ind./30 sec.) Honey bees (No. ind./60 sec.) Parasitic wasps (No. ind./30 sec.) Predators (No. ind./30 sec.) Wild bees (No. ind./60 sec.)	Herbivores (No. ind./30 sec.) Honey bees (No. ind./60 sec.) Parasitic wasps (No. ind./30 sec.) Predators (No. ind./30 sec.) Wild bees (No. ind./60 sec.)
Computed Response Variables (and Units) em.detail.computedResponseHelp ?	None	*	*	*

US EPA

EcoService Models Library (ESML)

View Runs

: Arthropod flower type preference, California, USA (EM-779)