EcoService Models Library (ESML)

Document: Evaluation of the NU-WRF rainfall forcasts for IFloodS (Doc-493)

493
Authors
Wu, D., Peters-Lidard, C., Tao, W., and W. Petersen
Year
2016
Title
Evaluation of the NU-WRF rainfall forcasts for IFloodS
Document Type
Journal Article
Journal
Journal of Hyddrometeorology
Volume
17
Pages
1317-1335
Abstract
The Iowa Flood Studies (IFloodS) campaign was conducted in eastern Iowa as a pre-GPM-launch campaign from 1 May to 15 June 2013. During the campaign period, real-time forecasts were conducted utilizing the NASA-UnifiedWeather Research and Forecasting (NU-WRF) Model to support the daily weather briefing. In this study, two sets of the NU-WRF rainfall forecasts are conducted with different soil initializations, one from the spatially interpolated North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) and the other produced by the Land Information System (LIS) using daily analysis of bias-corrected stage IV data. Both forecasts are then compared with NAM, stage IV, and Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) to understand the impact of land surface initialization on the predicted precipitation. In general, both NU-WRF runs are able to reproduce individual peaks of precipitation at the right time. NU-WRF is also able to replicate a better rainfall spatial distribution compared with NAM. Further sensitivity tests show that the highresolution runs (1 and 3 km) are able to better capture the precipitation event compared to its coarser-resolution counterpart (9 km). Finally, the two sets of NU-WRF simulations produce very close rainfall characteristics in bias, spatial and temporal correlation scores, and probability density function. The land surface initialization does not show a significant impact on short-term rainfall forecast, which is largely because of high soil moisture during the field campaign period.
URL Exit
DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0134.1
EMs citing this document as a source
EM-1038
EMs citing this document for a related EM
?
None
EMs citing this document for a compared EM
?
None