{PAGE NAME} | {WEB AREA NAME}

EM Identity and Description

EM Identification (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
EM Short Name em.detail.shortNameHelp ?	RUM: Valuing fishing quality, Michigan, USA	VELMA v. 2.0 disturbance	IPaC, USFWS, USA	CommunityViz, Albany county, Wyoming
EM Full Name em.detail.fullNameHelp ?	Random utility model (RUM) Valuing Recreational fishing quality in streams and rivers, Michigan, USA	VELMA (Visualizing Ecosystems for Land Management Assessment) version 2.0 disturbance	Information for Planning and Conservation tool, USFWS, U.S.	Wyoming Community Viz TM Partnership Phase I Pilot: Aquifer Protection and Community Viz TM in Albany County, Wyoming.
EM Source or Collection em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp ?	None	US EPA	*	*
EM Source Document ID	382 ? Comment: Data collected from Michigan Recreational Angler Survey, a mail survey administered monthly to random sample of Michigan fishing license holders since July 2008. Data available taken from 2008-2010.	366	451 ? Comment: Assume peer reviewed at least internally by USFWS	479 ? Comment: Published as a report by the University of Wyoming, but no record of peer review.
Document Author em.detail.documentAuthorHelp ?	Melstrom, R. T., Lupi, F., Esselman, P.C., and R. J. Stevenson	McKane, R. B., A. Brookes, K. Djang, M. Stieglitz, A. G. Abdelnour, F. Pan, J. J. Halama, P. B. Pettus and D. L. Phillips	U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service	Lieske, S. N., Mullen, S., Knapp, M., & Hamerlinck, J. D.
Document Year em.detail.documentYearHelp ?	2014	*	None	2003
Document Title em.detail.sourceIdHelp ?	Valuing recreational fishing quality at rivers and streams	VELMA Version 2.0 User Manual and Technical Documentation	Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC	Wyoming Community Viz TM Partnership Phase I Pilot: Aquifer Protection and Community Viz TM in Albany County, Wyoming
Document Status em.detail.statusCategoryHelp ?	Peer reviewed and published	*	Other or unclear (explain in Comment)	Not peer reviewed but is published (explain in Comment)
Comments on Status em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp ?	Published journal manuscript	Published report	Published report	Published report

Software and Access (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
EM Software Access info Exit em.detail.modelAccessInformationHelp ?	Not applicable	https://www.epa.gov/water-research/visualizing-ecosystem-land-management-assessments-velma-model-20	https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/	https://communityviz.com/
Contact Name em.detail.contactNameHelp ?	Richard Melstrom	Robert B. McKane	USFWS	Scott Lieske
Contact Address	Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA	U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, Oregon 97333	911 NE 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97232	Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Wyoming, Laramie WY 82071
Contact Email	melstrom@okstate.edu	mckane.bob@epa.gov	fwhq_ipac@fws.gov	lieske@uwyo.edu

EM Description (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Summary Description em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp ?	ABSTRACT: " This paper describes an economic model that links the demand for recreational stream fishing to fish biomass. Useful measures of fishing quality are often difficult to obtain. In the past, economists have linked the demand for fishing sites to species presence‐absence indicators or average self‐reported catch rates. The demand model presented here takes advantage of a unique data set of statewide biomass estimates for several popular game fish species in Michigan, including trout, bass and walleye. These data are combined with fishing trip information from a 2008–2010 survey of Michigan anglers in order to estimate a demand model. Fishing sites are defined by hydrologic unit boundaries and information on fish assemblages so that each site corresponds to the area of a small subwatershed, about 100–200 square miles in size. The random utility model choice set includes nearly all fishable streams in the state. The results indicate a significant relationship between the site choice behavior of anglers and the biomass of certain species. Anglers are more likely to visit streams in watersheds high in fish abundance, particularly for brook trout and walleye. The paper includes estimates of the economic value of several quality change and site loss scenarios. "	VELMA – Visualizing Ecosystems for Land Management Assessments - is a spatially distributed, eco-hydrological model that links a land surface hydrology model with a terrestrial biogeochemistry model for simulating the integrated responses of vegetation, soil, and water resources to interacting stressors. For example, VELMA can simulate how changes in climate and land use interact to affect soil water storage, surface and subsurface runoff, vertical drainage, evapotranspiration, vegetation and soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and transport of nitrate, ammonium, and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen to water bodies. VELMA differs from other existing eco-hydrology models in its simplicity, flexibility, and theoretical foundation. The model has a user-friendly Graphics User Interface (GUI) for easy input of model parameter values. In addition, advanced visualization of simulation results can enhance understanding of results and underlying concepts. VELMA’s visualization and interactivity features are packaged in an open-source, open-platform programming environment (Java / Eclipse). The development team for VELMA version 2.0 includes Dr. Bob McKane and coworkers at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Western Ecology Division, Dr. Marc Stieglitz and coworkers at the Georgia Institute of Technology, and Dr. Feifei Pan at the University of North Texas. AUTHOR'S DESCRIPTION: "Understanding how disturbances such as harvest, fire and fertilization affect ecosystem services has been a major motivation in the development of VELMA. For example, how do disturbances such as forest harvest or the application of agronomic fertilizers affect hydrological and biogeochemical processes controlling water quality and quantity, carbon sequestration, production of greenhouse gases, etc.? Abdelnour et al. (2011, 2013) have already demonstrated the use of VELMA v1.0 to simulate the effects of forest clearcutting on ecohydrological processes that regulate a variety of ecosystem services. With the addition of a tissue-specific plant biomass (LSR) simulator and an enhanced GUI, VELMA v2.0 significantly expands the detail, flexibility, and ease of use for simulating disturbance effects. Currently available disturbance models include: - BurnDisturbanceModel, effects of fire. - GrazeDisturbanceModel, effects of grazing. - FertilizeLsrDisturbanceModel, effects of fertilizer applications. - HarvestLsrDisturbanceModel, effects of biomass harvest. Each of these disturbance models specifies where and when a disturbance event will occur. The Burn, Graze and Harvest models have options for specifying how much of each plant tissue and detritus pool (leaves, stems, roots) will be removed and where it goes (offsite and/or to a specified onsite C and N pools). The Fertilize model has options for applying nitrogen as ammonium, nitrate, urea and/or manure."	IPaC is a project planning tool that streamlines the USFWS environmental review process. Explores species and habitat: See if any listed species, critical habitat, migratory birds or other natural resources may be impacted by your project. Using the map tool, explore other resources in your location, such as wetlands, wildlife refuges, GAP land cover, and other important biological resources. Conduct a regulatory review: Log in and define a project to get an official species list and evaluate potential impacts on resources managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Follow IPaC's Endangered Species Act (ESA) Review process—a streamlined, step-by-step consultation process available in select areas for certain project types, agencies, and species. Build a Consultation Package: Consultation Package Builder (CPB) replaces and improves on the original Impact Analysis by providing an interactive, step-by-step process to help you prepare a full consultation package leveraging U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service data and recommendations, including conservation measures designed to help you avoid or minimize effects to listed species.	The Wyoming Community VizTM Partnership was established in 2001 to promote the use of geographic information system-based planning support systems and related decision support technologies in community land-use planning and economic development activities in the State of Wyoming. Partnership members include several state agencies, local governments and several nongovernment organizations. Partnership coordination is provided by the Wyoming Rural Development Council. Research and technical support is coordinated by the Wyoming Geographic Information Science Center’s Spatial Decision Support System Research Program at the University of Wyoming. In June 2002, the Partnership initiated a three-phase plan to promote Community VizTM based planning support systems in Wyoming. Phase I of the Partnership plan was a “proof of concept” pilot project set in Albany County in southeastern Wyoming. The goal of the project was to demonstrate the application of Community VizTM to a Wyoming-specific issue (in this case, aquifer protection) and to determine potential challenges for broader adoption in terms of data requirements, computing infrastructure and technological expertise. The results of the Phase I pilot project are detailed in this report. Efforts are currently underway to secure funding for Phase II of the plan, which expands the use of Community VizTM into four additional Wyoming communities. Specific Phase II objectives are to expand the type and number of issues addressed by Community VizTM and increase the use of Community VizTM in the planning process. As a part of Phase II the Partnership will create a technical assistance network aimed at assisting communities with the technical challenges in applying the software to their planning issues. The third phase will expand the program to more communities in the state, maintain the technical assistance network, and monitor the impact of Community VizTM on the planning process.
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp ?	None identified	*	Determination of Effects on ESA listed taxa.	None provided
Biophysical Context	stream and river reaches of Michigan	No additional description provided	N/A	Groundwater recharge area, City of Laramie
EM Scenario Drivers em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp ?	targeted sport fish biomass	No scenarios presented	N/A	Continuation of trends

EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run em.detail.methodOrAppHelp ?	Method + Application (multiple runs exist)	Method Only	Method Only	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application
New or Pre-existing EM? em.detail.newOrExistHelp ?	New or revised model	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends

Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Document ID for related EM em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp ?	None	Doc-13 \| Doc-317 \| Doc-366 \| Doc-359	None	Doc-473
EM ID for related EM em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp ?	None	EM-883 \| EM-884 \| EM-375 \| EM-379 \| EM-380 \| EM-605 \| EM-892	None	None

EM Modeling Approach

EM Relationship to Time (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
EM Temporal Extent em.detail.tempExtentHelp ?	2008-2010	Not applicable	Not applicable	2050
EM Time Dependence em.detail.timeDependencyHelp ?	time-stationary	time-dependent	*	*
EM Time Reference (Future/Past) em.detail.futurePastHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
EM Time Continuity em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp ?	Not applicable	discrete	*	*
EM Temporal Grain Size Value em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp ?	Not applicable	1	*	*
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp ?	Not applicable	Day	*	*

EM spatial extent (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Bounding Type em.detail.boundingTypeHelp ?	Watershed/Catchment/HUC	Not applicable	Not applicable	*
Spatial Extent Name em.detail.extentNameHelp ?	HUCS in Michigan	Not applicable	Not applicable	Laramie City's aquifer protection area
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude) em.detail.extentAreaHelp ?	100,000-1,000,000 km^2	Not applicable	Not applicable	10-100 km^2

Spatial Distribution of Computations (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
EM Spatial Distribution em.detail.distributeLumpHelp ?	spatially distributed (in at least some cases)	*	spatially lumped (in all cases)	spatially lumped (in all cases)
Spatial Grain Type em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp ?	other (specify), for irregular (e.g., stream reach, lake basin)	area, for pixel or radial feature	Not applicable	Not applicable
Spatial Grain Size em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp ?	reach in HUC	user defined	Not applicable	Not applicable

EM Structure and Computation Approach (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
EM Computational Approach em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp ?	Numeric	*	Other or unclear (comment)	*
EM Determinism em.detail.deterStochHelp ?	deterministic	*	Not applicable	*
Statistical Estimation of EM em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp ?	Conventional (frequentist) statistics	*	None	*

Model Checking Procedures Used (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Model Calibration Reported? em.detail.calibrationHelp ?	No	Not applicable	Not applicable	Unclear
Model Goodness of Fit Reported? em.detail.goodnessFitHelp ?	Yes	Not applicable	Not applicable	No
Goodness of Fit (metric\| value \| unit) em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp ?	R squared \| 0.552 \| unitless	*	*	*
Model Operational Validation Reported? em.detail.validationHelp ?	No	Not applicable	Not applicable	Unclear
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported? em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp ?	No	Not applicable	Not applicable	Unclear
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported? em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp ?	No	Not applicable	Not applicable	Unclear
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions? em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*

EM Locations, Environments, Ecology

Location of EM Application (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])

EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
North America United States Michigan	*	*	North America United States Wyoming

Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)

EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
None	*	*	*

Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Centroid Latitude em.detail.ddLatHelp ?	45.12	Not applicable	Not applicable	41.31
Centroid Longitude em.detail.ddLongHelp ?	85.18	Not applicable	Not applicable	-105.46
Centroid Datum em.detail.datumHelp ?	WGS84	Not applicable	Not applicable	*
Centroid Coordinates Status em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp ?	Estimated	Not applicable	Not applicable	*

Environments and Scales Modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
EM Environmental Sub-Class em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp ?	Rivers and Streams	Terrestrial Environment (sub-classes not fully specified)	Aquatic Environment (sub-classes not fully specified) \| Rivers and Streams \| Inland Wetlands \| Lakes and Ponds \| Near Coastal Marine and Estuarine \| Open Ocean and Seas \| Ground Water \| Terrestrial Environment (sub-classes not fully specified) \| Forests \| Agroecosystems \| Created Greenspace \| Grasslands \| Scrubland/Shrubland \| Barren \| Tundra \| Ice and Snow \| Atmosphere	Ground Water \| Terrestrial Environment (sub-classes not fully specified)
Specific Environment Type em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp ?	stream reaches	Terrestrial environment sub-classes	None	watershed
EM Ecological Scale em.detail.ecoScaleHelp ?	Ecological scale is finer than that of the Environmental Sub-class	*	Not applicable	Ecological scale corresponds to the Environmental Sub-class

Organisms modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
EM Organismal Scale em.detail.orgScaleHelp ?	Not applicable	*	Other (Comment) ? Comment: ESA designations include species and Ecological Significan Units of species	*

Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified

EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Family panfishes Species Brown trout smallmouth bass Brook trout Walleye	*	*	*

EnviroAtlas URL

EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD), Enabling Conditions, Employment Rate	Carbon storage by tree biomass (kg/m2), Ecosystem Markets: Imperiled Species and Habitats	GAP Ecological Systems, Percent GAP Status 1 & 2	Dasymetric Allocation of Population, Total Annual Reduced Nitrogen Deposition, Employment Rate

EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system

* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left

CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)

EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
[Ecosystem] Provisioning Nutrition Biomass Wild animals and their outputs	[Ecosystem] Provisioning Materials Biomass Fibres and other materials from plants, algae and animals for direct use or processing	[Ecosystem] Regulation & Maintenance Maintenance of physical, chemical, biological conditions Lifecycle maintenance, habitat and gene pool protection Maintaining nursery populations and habitats	[Non-ecosystem] Regulation & Maintenance by natural physical structures and processes Mediation of waste, toxics and other nuisances By natural chemical and physical processes Not applicable [Ecosystem] Provisioning Materials Water Ground water for non-drinking purposes [Ecosystem] Cultural Physical and intellectual interactions with biota, ecosystems, and land-/seascapes [environmental settings] Physical and experiential interactions Physical use of land-/seascapes in different environmental settings Intellectual and representative interactions Aesthetic

National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS) Plus

(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)

EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Rivers and Streams (111) Fauna (4) Fish Quality Indicator	*	Rivers and Streams (111) Fauna (4) Fish Stock Indicator	Groundwater Water (3) Liquid water Flow Indicator

EM Variable Names (and Units)

* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.

To view run information for variables, select any variable below or view run data for all variables.

Predictor

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Driving Variables (and Units) em.detail.drivingVariableHelp ?	Agriculture (%) All species angling license (y/n) (Not applicable) Angler home zipcode (Not applicable) Avg. light vehicle fuel economy ($/gal) Fishing trip type (individual angler) (Not applicable) Forest (%) Gasoline price (monthly retail) ($/gal) Land use land cover class (site reach) (Not applicable) Maintenance and depreciation (vehicle) ($/mi) Mean angler income ($/yr) Mean temperature (July) (°C) NHD Hydrologic units (Not applicable) National wild and scenic rivers protection (%) Restricted angling license (y/n) (Not applicable) Round trip travel distance (mi) Stream length (km) Targeted sport fish (Not applicable) Targeted sport fish mean biomass (brook trout) (kg/ha) Targeted sport fish mean biomass (brown trout) (kg/ha) Targeted sport fish mean biomass (panfishes) (kg/ha) Targeted sport fish mean biomass (smallmouth bass) (kg/ha) Targeted sport fish mean biomass (walleye) (kg/ha) Urban (%)	Land cover (Not applicable) Land cover age threshold (years)	Area of interest (AOI) species specific questions (Not applicable) Geographic range maps of all species of concern (listed or otherwise) (m^2) Marine mammals (Not applicable) Migratory birds of conservation concern (Not applicable) Programatic determination keys (Not applicable) Project location (point or polygon) (Not applicable) Qualification questions for federal involvement (Y/N) (Not applicable) USFWS managed refuges and fish hatcheries (Not applicable) Wetlands & aquatic areas of concern (Not applicable)	Albany county study area boundary (Not reported) City annual budget data ($) Common land use list (Not reported) Distances from residential parcels to recreational trail access (miles) Existing development (Not reported) Existing land use or zoning data (Not reported) Guidelines for future land use/zoning (Not reported) Number of vehicle trips taken (trips) Population projections (Not reported) Property, sales, and lodging tax data ($) Proportion of land development to open space seen from observation points (NA) Roads/infrastructure (Not reported) Species distribution GIS data (Not reported) Topography (Not reported) Vehicle miles traveled (miles) Water consumption data (millions of gallons) Water quality data (nitrate levels) (ppm)
Constant or Factor Variables (and Units) em.detail.constantFactorVariableHelp ?	Brook trout coefficient (unitless) Brown trout coefficient (unitless) Cold water (No. trips) Did not target particular species (y/n) (Not applicable) Opportunity cost constant (unitless) Panfishes coefficient (unitless) Smallmouth bass coefficient (unitless) Targed panfishes (y/n) (Not applicable) Targeted bass (yes/no) (Not applicable) Targeted other fishes (y/n) (Not applicable) Targeted trout (y/n) (Not applicable) Targeted walleye (y/n) (Not applicable) Walleye coefficient (unitless)	Aboveground stem biomass (g C m^-2) Belowground stem biomass (g C m^-2) Disturbance type (for example, harvest, fire, grazing) (Not applicable) Fraction of aboveground stem biomass converted (%) Fraction of belowground stem biomass converted (%) Fraction of converted aboveground stem biomass removed off site (%) Fraction of converted belowground stem biomass removed off site (%) Fraction of converted leaf biomass removed off site (%) Fraction of converted root biomass removed off site (%) Fraction of leaf biomass converted (%) Fraction of root biomass converted (%) Leaf biomass (g C m^-2) Root biomass (g C m^-2)	None	*

Intermediate

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units) em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp ?	Driving costs ($) Expected targeted sport fish presence by reach (cold or warm water) (Not applicable) Opportunity cost of travel time ($) Stream reaches (fishable) within 200 miles of angler zipcode (Not applicable) Travel costs ($)	Aboveground stem biomass converted (g C m^-2) Belowground stem biomass converted (g C m^-2) Leaf biomass converted (g C m^-2) Root biomass converted (g m^-2)	Critical habitat (proposed and designated for species of concern) (Not applicable) Official species list (candidate, proposed and T&E species) potentially within area of interest (AOI) (Not applicable)	*

Response

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-660	New or revised model	New or revised model	Continuation of trends
Observed Response Variables (and Units) em.detail.observedResponseHelp ?	None	None	None	*
Computed Response Variables (and Units) em.detail.computedResponseHelp ?	Angler recreational demand increase for brook trout (WTP) ($) Angler recreational demand increase for brown trout (WTP) ($) Angler recreational demand increase for panfishes (WTP) ($) Angler recreational demand increase for smallmouth bass (WTP) ($) Angler recreational demand increase for walleye (WTP) ($)	Aboveground stem detritus (g C m^-2) Belowground stem detritus (layers 1,2,3,4) (g C m^-2) Converted aboveground stem biomass removed off site (g C m^-2) Converted belowground stem biomass removed off site (g C m^-2) Converted leaf biomass removed off site (g C m^-2) Converted root biomass removed off site (g C m^-2) Leaf detritus (g C m^-2) Root detritus (layers 1,2,3,4) (g C m^-2)	Determination of effect (Not applicable) Project qualification of a pre-exsting programmatic Sec. 7 consultaton or internal FWS analysis (Not applicable)	Cost of community services (millions of dollars) Local tax revenues (millions of dollars) Quantity of water (millions of gallons) Recreation access (Miles to trail) Riparian area impacted (Acres) Traffic impacts (Vehicle miles traveled) Visual impact (Not reported) Water quality (nitrate levels) (ppm) Wildlife habitat (acres)

US EPA

EcoService Models Library (ESML)

View Runs

: Random utility model (RUM) Valuing Recreational fishing quality in streams and rivers, Michigan, USA (EM-660)

EM Identity and Description

Comment:

Comment:

Comment:

Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML

EM Modeling Approach

EM Locations, Environments, Ecology

Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])

Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)

Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)

Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled

Comment:

Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified

EnviroAtlas URL

EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system

* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left

CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)

National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS) Plus

(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)

EM Variable Names (and Units)

* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.

Predictor

Intermediate

Response