EcoService Models Library (ESML)

Document: Application of chemical transport model CMAQ to policy decisions regarding PM2.5 in the UK (Doc-483)

483
Authors
Chemel, C., Fisher, B.E.A., Kong, X., Francis, X.V., Sokhi, R.S., Good, N., Collins, W.J. and Folberth, G.A.
Year
2014
Title
Application of chemical transport model CMAQ to policy decisions regarding PM2.5 in the UK
Document Type
Journal Article
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Atmospheric Environment
Volume
82
Pages
410-417
Abstract
This paper shows how the advanced chemical transport model CMAQ can be used to estimate future levels of PM2.5 in the UK, the key air pollutant in terms of human health effects, but one which is largely made up from the formation of secondary particulate in the atmosphere. By adding the primary particulate contribution from typical urban roads and including a margin for error, it is concluded that the current indicative limit value for PM2.5 will largely be met in 2020 assuming 2006 meteorological conditions. Contributions to annual average regional PM2.5 concentration from wild fires in Europe in 2006 and from possible climate change between 2006 and 2020 are shown to be small compared with the change in PM2.5 concentration arising from changes in emissions between 2006 and 2020. The contribution from emissions from major industrial sources regulated in the UK is estimated from additional CMAQ calculations. The potential source strength of these emissions is a useful indicator of the linearity of the response of the atmosphere to changes in emissions. Uncertainties in the modelling of regional and local sources are taken into account based on previous evaluations of the models. Future actual trends in emissions mean that exceedences of limit values may arise, and these and further research into PM2.5 health effects will need to be part of the future strategy to manage PM2.5 concentrations.
URL Exit
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231013007541
EMs citing this document as a source
EM-1021
EMs citing this document for a related EM
?
None
EMs citing this document for a compared EM
?
None