EcoService Models Library (ESML)
Home
Search EMs
My
EMs 
Learn about
ESML
View ESML Data Maploading
EM: Nitrate removal by potential wetland restoration, Mississippi River subbasins, USA (EM-627)
Collapse All
Expand All
- Export Data to Spreadsheet (Free Viewers)
- View Variable Relationship Diagram (PDF)(1 pp, 80 KB, About PDF)
EM Identity and Description
EM Identification
|
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-627 |
|
EM Short Name
em.detail.shortNameHelp
?
|
N removal by wetland restoration, Midwest, USA |
|
EM Full Name
em.detail.fullNameHelp
?
|
Nitrate removal by potential wetland restoration, Mississippi River subbasins, USA |
|
EM Source or Collection
em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp
?
|
None |
|
EM Source Document ID
|
370 ?Comment:Final project report to U.S. Department of Agriculture; Project number: IOW06682. December 2006. |
|
Document Author
em.detail.documentAuthorHelp
?
|
Crumpton, W. G., G. A. Stenback, B. A. Miller, and M. J. Helmers |
|
Document Year
em.detail.documentYearHelp
?
|
2006 |
|
Document Title
em.detail.sourceIdHelp
?
|
Potential benefits of wetland filters for tile drainage systems: Impact on nitrate loads to Mississippi River subbasins |
|
Document Status
em.detail.statusCategoryHelp
?
|
Neither peer reviewed nor published (explain in Comment) |
|
Comments on Status
em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp
?
|
Published report |
Software and Access
| Not applicable | |
|
Contact Name
em.detail.contactNameHelp
?
|
William G. Crumpton |
|
Contact Address
|
Dept. of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 |
|
Contact Email
|
crumpton@iastate.edu |
EM Description
|
Summary Description
em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp
?
|
ABSTRACT: "The primary objective of this project was to estimate the nitrate reduction that could be achieved using restored wetlands as nitrogen sinks in tile-drained regions of the upper Mississippi River (UMR) and Ohio River basins. This report provides an assessment of nitrate concentrations and loads across the UMR and Ohio River basins and the mass reduction of nitrate loading that could be achieved using wetlands to intercept nonpoint source nitrate loads. Nitrate concentration and stream discharge data were used to calculate stream nitrate loading and annual flow-weighted average (FWA) nitrate concentrations and to develop a model of FWA nitrate concentration based on land use. Land use accounts for 90% of the variation among stations in long term FWA nitrate concentrations and was used to estimate FWA nitrate concentrations for a 100 ha grid across the UMR and Ohio River basins. Annual water yield for grid cells was estimated by interpolating over selected USGS monitoring station water yields across the UMR and Ohio River basins. For 1990 to 1999, mass nitrate export from each grid area was estimated as the product of the FWA nitrate concentration, water yield and grid area. To estimate potential nitrate removal by wetlands across the same grid area, mass balance simulations were used to estimate percent nitrate reduction for hypothetical wetland sites distributed across the UMR and Ohio River basins. Nitrate reduction was estimated using a temperature dependent, area-based, first order model. Model inputs included local temperature from the National Climatic Data Center and water yield estimated from USGS stream flow data. Results were used to develop a nonlinear model for percent nitrate removal as a function of hydraulic loading rate (HLR) and temperature. Mass nitrate removal for potential wetland restorations distributed across the UMR and Ohio River basin was estimated based on the expected mass load and the predicted percent removal. Similar functions explained most of the variability in per cent and mass removal reported for field scale experimental wetlands in the UMR and Ohio River basins. Results suggest that a 30% reduction in nitrate load from the UMR and Ohio River basins could be achieved using 210,000-450,000 ha of wetlands targeted on the highest nitrate contributing areas." AUTHOR'S DESCRIPTION: "Percent nitrate removal was estimated based on HLR functions (Figure 19) spanning a 3 fold range in loss rate coefficient (Crumpton 2001) and encompassing the observed performance reported for wetlands in the UMR and Ohio River basins (Table 2, Figure 7). The nitrate load was multiplied by the expected percent nitrate removal to estimate the mass removal. This procedure was repeated for each restoration scenario each year in the simulation period (1990 to 1999)… for a scenario with a wetland/watershed area ratio of 2%. These results are based on the assumption that the FWA nitrate concentration versus percent row crop r |
|
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited
em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp
?
|
None identified |
|
Biophysical Context
|
No additional description provided |
|
EM Scenario Drivers
em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp
?
|
More conservative, average and less conservative nitrate loss rate |
EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications
|
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run
em.detail.methodOrAppHelp
?
|
Method + Application (multiple runs exist) |
|
New or Pre-existing EM?
em.detail.newOrExistHelp
?
|
New or revised model |
Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML
em.detail.relatedEmHelp
?
|
Document ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp
?
|
None |
|
EM ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp
?
|
None |
EM Modeling Approach
EM Relationship to Time
|
EM Temporal Extent
em.detail.tempExtentHelp
?
|
1973-1999 |
|
EM Time Dependence
em.detail.timeDependencyHelp
?
|
time-dependent |
|
EM Time Reference (Future/Past)
em.detail.futurePastHelp
?
|
future time |
|
EM Time Continuity
em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp
?
|
discrete |
|
EM Temporal Grain Size Value
em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp
?
|
1 |
|
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit
em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp
?
|
Day |
EM Spatial Extent
|
Bounding Type
em.detail.boundingTypeHelp
?
|
Watershed/Catchment/HUC |
|
Spatial Extent Name
em.detail.extentNameHelp
?
|
Upper Mississippi River and Ohio River basins |
|
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude)
em.detail.extentAreaHelp
?
|
>1,000,000 km^2 |
Spatial Distribution of Computations
|
EM Spatial Distribution
em.detail.distributeLumpHelp
?
|
spatially distributed (in at least some cases) |
|
Spatial Grain Type
em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp
?
|
area, for pixel or radial feature |
|
Spatial Grain Size
em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp
?
|
1 km2 |
EM Structure and Computation Approach
|
EM Computational Approach
em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp
?
|
Numeric |
|
EM Determinism
em.detail.deterStochHelp
?
|
deterministic |
|
Statistical Estimation of EM
em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp
?
|
|
Model Checking Procedures Used
|
Model Calibration Reported?
em.detail.calibrationHelp
?
|
No |
|
Model Goodness of Fit Reported?
em.detail.goodnessFitHelp
?
|
No |
|
Goodness of Fit (metric| value | unit)
em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp
?
|
None |
|
Model Operational Validation Reported?
em.detail.validationHelp
?
|
No ?Comment:However, agreement of submodel and intermediate components; annual discharge (R2=0.79), and nitrate-N load (R2=0.74), based on GIS land use were determined in comparison with USGS NASQAN data. |
|
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported?
em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp
?
|
No |
|
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported?
em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp
?
|
No |
|
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions?
em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Locations, Environments, Ecology
Location of EM Application
Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])
em.detail.relationToSpaceTerrestrialHelp
?
|
Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)
em.detail.relationToSpaceMarineHelp
?
| None |
Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)
|
Centroid Latitude
em.detail.ddLatHelp
?
|
40.6 |
|
Centroid Longitude
em.detail.ddLongHelp
?
|
-88.4 |
|
Centroid Datum
em.detail.datumHelp
?
|
WGS84 |
|
Centroid Coordinates Status
em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp
?
|
Estimated |
Environments and Scales Modeled
|
EM Environmental Sub-Class
em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp
?
|
Rivers and Streams | Inland Wetlands | Agroecosystems |
|
Specific Environment Type
em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp
?
|
Agroecosystems and associated drainage and wetlands |
|
EM Ecological Scale
em.detail.ecoScaleHelp
?
|
Ecological scale corresponds to the Environmental Sub-class |
Scale and taxa of organisms modeled
Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled
em.detail.nameOfOrgsOrGroupsHelp
?
|
EM Organismal Scale
em.detail.orgScaleHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified
taxonomyHelp
?
| None Available |
EnviroAtlas URL
em.detail.enviroAtlasURLHelp
?
| GAP Ecological Systems, National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHD PlusV2), Average Annual Precipitation, Total Annual Nitrogen Deposition |
EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system
CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)
em.detail.cicesHelp
?
|
(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)
fegs2Help
?
|
EM Variable Names (and Units)
Predictor
em.detail.variablesPredictorHelp
?
|
Driving Variables (and Units)
view details (7 variables)
em.detail.drivingVariableHelp
?
|
|
|
Constant or Factor Variables (and Units)
view details (2 variables)
em.detail.constantFactorVariableHelp
?
|
Intermediate
|
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units)
view details (5 variables)
em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp
?
|
Response
em.detail.variablesResponseHelp
?
|
Observed Response Variables (and Units)
em.detail.observedResponseHelp
?
|
None |
|
Computed Response Variables (and Units)
view details (2 variables)
em.detail.computedResponseHelp
?
|