EcoService Models Library (ESML)
loading
EM: SolVES, Social Values for Ecosystem Services, Bridger-Teton National Forest, WY (EM-628)
Collapse All
Expand All
- Export Data to Spreadsheet (Free Viewers)
- View Variable Relationship Diagram (PDF)(1 pp, 80 KB, About PDF)
EM Identity and Description
EM Identification
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-628 |
EM Short Name
em.detail.shortNameHelp
?
|
SolVES, Bridger-Teton NF, WY |
EM Full Name
em.detail.fullNameHelp
?
|
SolVES, Social Values for Ecosystem Services, Bridger-Teton National Forest, WY |
EM Source or Collection
em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp
?
|
None |
EM Source Document ID
|
369 |
Document Author
em.detail.documentAuthorHelp
?
|
Sherrouse, B.C., Semmens, D.J., and J.M. Clement |
Document Year
em.detail.documentYearHelp
?
|
2014 |
Document Title
em.detail.sourceIdHelp
?
|
An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming |
Document Status
em.detail.statusCategoryHelp
?
|
Peer reviewed and published |
Comments on Status
em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp
?
|
Published journal manuscript |
Software and Access
Not applicable | |
Contact Name
em.detail.contactNameHelp
?
|
Benson Sherrouse |
Contact Address
|
USGS, 5522 Research Park Dr., Baltimore, MD 21228, USA |
Contact Email
|
bcsherrouse@usgs.gov |
EM Description
Summary Description
em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp
?
|
[ABSTRACT: " "Despite widespread recognition that social-value information is needed to inform stakeholders and decision makers regarding trade-offs in environmental management, it too often remains absent from ecosystem service assessments. Although quantitative indicators of social values need to be explicitly accounted for in the decision-making process, they need not be monetary. Ongoing efforts to map such values demonstrate how they can also be made spatially explicit and relatable to underlying ecological information. We originally developed Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) as a tool to assess, map, and quantify nonmarket values perceived by various groups of ecosystem stakeholders.With SolVES 2.0 we have extended the functionality by integrating SolVES with Maxent maximum entropy modeling software to generate more complete social-value maps from available value and preference survey data and to produce more robust models describing the relationship between social values and ecosystems. The current study has two objectives: (1) evaluate how effectively the value index, a quantitative, nonmonetary social-value indicator calculated by SolVES, reproduces results from more common statistical methods of social-survey data analysis and (2) examine how the spatial results produced by SolVES provide additional information that could be used by managers and stakeholders to better understand more complex relationships among stakeholder values, attitudes, and preferences. To achieve these objectives, we applied SolVES to value and preference survey data collected for three national forests, the Pike and San Isabel in Colorado and the Bridger–Teton and the Shoshone in Wyoming. Value index results were generally consistent with results found through more common statistical analyses of the survey data such as frequency, discriminant function, and correlation analyses. In addition, spatial analysis of the social-value maps produced by SolVES provided information that was useful for explaining relationships between stakeholder values and forest uses. Our results suggest that SolVES can effectively reproduce information derived from traditional statistical analyses while adding spatially explicit, socialvalue information that can contribute to integrated resource assessment, planning, and management of forests and other ecosystems. |
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited
em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp
?
|
None |
Biophysical Context
|
Rocky mountain conifer forests |
EM Scenario Drivers
em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp
?
|
N/A |
EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run
em.detail.methodOrAppHelp
?
|
Method + Application |
New or Pre-existing EM?
em.detail.newOrExistHelp
?
|
New or revised model |
Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML
em.detail.relatedEmHelp
?
Document ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp
?
|
None |
EM ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp
?
|
EM-629 | EM-626 |
EM Modeling Approach
EM Relationship to Time
EM Temporal Extent
em.detail.tempExtentHelp
?
|
2004-2008 |
EM Time Dependence
em.detail.timeDependencyHelp
?
|
time-stationary |
EM Time Reference (Future/Past)
em.detail.futurePastHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Time Continuity
em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Temporal Grain Size Value
em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit
em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Spatial Extent
Bounding Type
em.detail.boundingTypeHelp
?
|
Geopolitical |
Spatial Extent Name
em.detail.extentNameHelp
?
|
National Park |
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude)
em.detail.extentAreaHelp
?
|
1000-10,000 km^2. |
Spatial Distribution of Computations
EM Spatial Distribution
em.detail.distributeLumpHelp
?
|
spatially distributed (in at least some cases) |
Spatial Grain Type
em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp
?
|
area, for pixel or radial feature |
Spatial Grain Size
em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp
?
|
30m2 |
EM Structure and Computation Approach
EM Computational Approach
em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp
?
|
Numeric |
EM Determinism
em.detail.deterStochHelp
?
|
deterministic |
Statistical Estimation of EM
em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp
?
|
|
Model Checking Procedures Used
Model Calibration Reported?
em.detail.calibrationHelp
?
|
No |
Model Goodness of Fit Reported?
em.detail.goodnessFitHelp
?
|
Yes |
Goodness of Fit (metric| value | unit)
em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp
?
|
|
Model Operational Validation Reported?
em.detail.validationHelp
?
|
No |
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported?
em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp
?
|
No |
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported?
em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp
?
|
No |
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions?
em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Locations, Environments, Ecology
Location of EM Application
Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])
em.detail.relationToSpaceTerrestrialHelp
?
|
Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)
em.detail.relationToSpaceMarineHelp
?
None |
Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)
Centroid Latitude
em.detail.ddLatHelp
?
|
43.93 |
Centroid Longitude
em.detail.ddLongHelp
?
|
110.24 |
Centroid Datum
em.detail.datumHelp
?
|
WGS84 |
Centroid Coordinates Status
em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp
?
|
Estimated |
Environments and Scales Modeled
EM Environmental Sub-Class
em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp
?
|
Forests |
Specific Environment Type
em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp
?
|
Montain forest |
EM Ecological Scale
em.detail.ecoScaleHelp
?
|
Ecological scale is finer than that of the Environmental Sub-class |
Scale and taxa of organisms modeled
Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled
em.detail.nameOfOrgsOrGroupsHelp
?
EM Organismal Scale
em.detail.orgScaleHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified
taxonomyHelp
?
None Available |
EnviroAtlas URL
em.detail.enviroAtlasURLHelp
?
GAP Ecological Systems, Enabling Conditions |
EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system
CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)
em.detail.cicesHelp
?
|
(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)
fegs2Help
?
|
EM Variable Names (and Units)
Predictor
em.detail.variablesPredictorHelp
?
Intermediate
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units)
view details (1 variable)
em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp
?
|
Response
em.detail.variablesResponseHelp
?