EcoService Models Library (ESML)
loading
EM: FORCLIM (FORests in a changing CLIMate) v2.9, Santiam watershed, OR, USA (EM-208)
View EM Runs
Collapse All
Expand All
- Export Data to Spreadsheet (Free Viewers)
- View Variable Relationship Diagram (PDF)(1 pp, 80 KB, About PDF)
EM Identity and Description
EM Identification
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-208 |
EM Short Name
em.detail.shortNameHelp
?
|
FORCLIM v2.9, Santiam watershed, OR, USA |
EM Full Name
em.detail.fullNameHelp
?
|
FORCLIM (FORests in a changing CLIMate) v2.9, Santiam watershed, OR, USA |
EM Source or Collection
em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp
?
|
US EPA |
EM Source Document ID
|
23 ?Comment:Related document ID 22 is a secondary source providing tree species specific parameters in appendix. |
Document Author
em.detail.documentAuthorHelp
?
|
Busing, R. T., Solomon, A. M., McKane, R. B. and Burdick, C. A. |
Document Year
em.detail.documentYearHelp
?
|
2007 |
Document Title
em.detail.sourceIdHelp
?
|
Forest dynamics in Oregon landscapes: evaluation and application of an individual-based model |
Document Status
em.detail.statusCategoryHelp
?
|
Peer reviewed and published |
Comments on Status
em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp
?
|
Published journal manuscript |
Software and Access
Not applicable | |
Contact Name
em.detail.contactNameHelp
?
|
Richard T. Busing |
Contact Address
|
U.S. Geological Survey, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97333 USA |
Contact Email
|
rtbusing@aol.com |
EM Description
Summary Description
em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp
?
|
ABSTRACT: "The FORCLIM model of forest dynamics was tested against field survey data for its ability to simulate basal area and composition of old forests across broad climatic gradients in western Oregon, USA. The model was also tested for its ability to capture successional trends in ecoregions of the west Cascade Range. It was then applied to simulate present and future (1990-2050) forest landscape dynamics of a watershed in the west Cascades. Various regimes of climate change and harvesting in the watershed were considered in the landscape application." AUTHOR'S DESCRIPTION: "Effects of different management histories on the landscape were incorporated using the land management (conservation, plan, or development trend) and forest age categories…the plan trend was an intermediate alternative, representing the continuation of current policies and trends, whereas the conservation and development trends were possible alternatives…Non-forested areas were given a forest age of zero; forested areas were assigned to one of eight forest age classes: >0-20 yr, 21-40 yr, 41-60 yr, 61-80 yr, 81-200 yr, 201-400 yr, and >600 yr in 1990…two climate change scenarios were used, representing lower and upper extremes projected by a set of global climate models: (1) minor warming with drier summers, and (2) major warming with wetter conditions…For the first scenario, temperature was increased by 0.5°C in 2025 and by 1.5°C in 2045. Precipitation from October to March was increased 2% in 2025 and decreased 2% in 2045. Precipitation from April to September was decreased 4% in 2025 and 7% in 2045. For the second scenario, temperature was by increased 2.6°C in 2025 and by 3.2°C in 2045. Precipitation from October to March was increased 18% in 2025 and 22% in 2045. Precipitation from April to September was increased 14% in 2025 and 9% in 2045. |
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited
em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp
?
|
None identified |
Biophysical Context
|
No additional description provided |
EM Scenario Drivers
em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp
?
|
Land Management (3); Climate Change (3) |
EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run
em.detail.methodOrAppHelp
?
|
Method + Application (multiple runs exist) View EM Runs ?Comment:Runs differentiated by scenario combination. |
New or Pre-existing EM?
em.detail.newOrExistHelp
?
|
Application of existing model |
Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML
em.detail.relatedEmHelp
?
Document ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp
?
|
Doc-22 | Doc-23 ?Comment:Related document ID 22 is a secondary source providing tree species specific parameters in appendix. |
EM ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp
?
|
EM-146 | EM-186 | EM-224 |
EM Modeling Approach
EM Relationship to Time
EM Temporal Extent
em.detail.tempExtentHelp
?
|
1990-2050 |
EM Time Dependence
em.detail.timeDependencyHelp
?
|
time-dependent |
EM Time Reference (Future/Past)
em.detail.futurePastHelp
?
|
future time |
EM Time Continuity
em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp
?
|
discrete |
EM Temporal Grain Size Value
em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp
?
|
1 |
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit
em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp
?
|
Year |
EM Spatial Extent
Bounding Type
em.detail.boundingTypeHelp
?
|
Watershed/Catchment/HUC |
Spatial Extent Name
em.detail.extentNameHelp
?
|
South Santiam watershed |
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude)
em.detail.extentAreaHelp
?
|
100-1000 km^2 |
Spatial Distribution of Computations
EM Spatial Distribution
em.detail.distributeLumpHelp
?
|
spatially distributed (in at least some cases) |
Spatial Grain Type
em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp
?
|
area, for pixel or radial feature |
Spatial Grain Size
em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp
?
|
0.08 ha |
EM Structure and Computation Approach
EM Computational Approach
em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp
?
|
Numeric |
EM Determinism
em.detail.deterStochHelp
?
|
deterministic |
Statistical Estimation of EM
em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp
?
|
|
Model Checking Procedures Used
Model Calibration Reported?
em.detail.calibrationHelp
?
|
No |
Model Goodness of Fit Reported?
em.detail.goodnessFitHelp
?
|
No |
Goodness of Fit (metric| value | unit)
em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp
?
|
None |
Model Operational Validation Reported?
em.detail.validationHelp
?
|
No |
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported?
em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp
?
|
No |
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported?
em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp
?
|
No |
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions?
em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp
?
|
N/A |
EM Locations, Environments, Ecology
Location of EM Application
Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])
em.detail.relationToSpaceTerrestrialHelp
?
|
Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)
em.detail.relationToSpaceMarineHelp
?
None |
Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)
Centroid Latitude
em.detail.ddLatHelp
?
|
44.24 |
Centroid Longitude
em.detail.ddLongHelp
?
|
-122.24 |
Centroid Datum
em.detail.datumHelp
?
|
None provided |
Centroid Coordinates Status
em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp
?
|
Provided |
Environments and Scales Modeled
EM Environmental Sub-Class
em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp
?
|
Forests |
Specific Environment Type
em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp
?
|
primarily Conifer Forest |
EM Ecological Scale
em.detail.ecoScaleHelp
?
|
Ecological scale is finer than that of the Environmental Sub-class |
Scale and taxa of organisms modeled
Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled
em.detail.nameOfOrgsOrGroupsHelp
?
EM Organismal Scale
em.detail.orgScaleHelp
?
|
Species |
Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified
taxonomyHelp
?
|
EnviroAtlas URL
em.detail.enviroAtlasURLHelp
?
GAP Ecological Systems, Average Annual Precipitation |
EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system
CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)
em.detail.cicesHelp
?
|
(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)
fegs2Help
?
None |
EM Variable Names (and Units)
Predictor
em.detail.variablesPredictorHelp
?
Intermediate
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units)
em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp
?
|
None |
Response
em.detail.variablesResponseHelp
?
Observed Response Variables (and Units)
em.detail.observedResponseHelp
?
|
None |
Computed Response Variables (and Units)
view details (3 variables)
em.detail.computedResponseHelp
?
|