{PAGE NAME} | {WEB AREA NAME}

EM Identity and Description

EM Identification (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
EM Short Name em.detail.shortNameHelp ?	Envision, Puget Sound, WA, USA	*	*	*
EM Full Name em.detail.fullNameHelp ?	Envision, Puget Sound, WA, USA	*	*	*
EM Source or Collection em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp ?	Envision	*	*	*
EM Source Document ID	313 ? Comment: Doc 314 is a secondary source. It is a webpage guide intended to provide support for developing an application using ENVISION.	* ? Comment: Doc 314 is an additional source for this EM.	*	*
Document Author em.detail.documentAuthorHelp ?	Bolte, J. and Vache, K.	*	*	*
Document Year em.detail.documentYearHelp ?	2010	*	*	*
Document Title em.detail.sourceIdHelp ?	Envisioning Puget Sound Alternative Futures: PSNERP Final Report	*	*	*
Document Status em.detail.statusCategoryHelp ?	Documentation is peer-reviewed and published	*	*	*
Comments on Status em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp ?	Published report	*	*	*

Software and Access (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
EM Software Access info Exit em.detail.modelAccessInformationHelp ?	http://envision.bioe.orst.edu	*	*	*
Contact Name em.detail.contactNameHelp ?	John Bolte ? Comment: Phone# 541-737-2041	*	*	*
Contact Address	Oregon State University, Dept. of Biological & Ecological Engineering, 116C Gilmore Hall, Corvallis, OR 97333	*	*	*
Contact Email	boltej@engr.orst.edu	*	*	*

EM Description (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Summary Description em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp ?	SUMMARY: "...the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project, completed an analysis of alternative future regional trajectories of landscape change for the Puget Sound region. This effort developed three scenarios of change: 1) Status Quo, reflecting a continuation of current trends in the region, 2) Managed Growth, reflecting the adoption of an aggressive set of land use management policies focusing on protecting and restoring ecosystem function and concentrating growth within Urban Growth Areas (UGA) and near regional growth centers, and 3) Unmanaged Growth, reflecting a relaxation of land use restrictions with limited protection of ecosystem functions. Analyses assumed a fixed population growth rate across all three scenarios, defined by the Washington Office of Financial Management county level growth estimates. Scenarios were generated using a spatially- and temporally-explicit alternative futures analysis model, Envision, previously developed by Oregon State University researchers. The model accepts as input a vector-based representation of the landscape and associated datasets describing relevant landscape characteristics, descriptors of various processes influencing landscape change, and a set of policies, or decision alternatives, which reflect scenario-specific land management alternatives. The model generates 1) a set of spatial coverages (maps) reflecting scenario outcomes of a variety of landscape variables, most notably land use/land cover, shoreline modifications, and population projections, and 2) a set of summary statistics describing landscape change variables summarized across spatial reporting units. Analyses were run on each of such sub-basins in the Puget Sound, and aggregated to providing Sound-wide results. This information is being used by PSNERP to project future impairment of ecosystem functions, goods, and services. The Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem project data also provide inputs to calculate aspects of future nearshore process degradation. Impairment and degradation are primary factors being used to define future conditions for the PSNERP General Investigation Study." AUTHOR'S DESCRIPTION: "In this report, we document the application of an alternative futures analysis framework that incorporates these capabilities to the analysis of alternative future trajectories in the Puget Sound region. This framework, Envision (Bolte et al, 2007; Hulse et al. 2008) is a spatially and temporally explicit, standards-based, open source toolset specifically designed to facilitate alternative futures analyses. It employs a multiagent-based modeling approach that contains a robust capability for defining alternative management strategies and scenarios, incorporating a variety of landscape change processes, and creating maps of alternative landscape trajectories, expressed though a variety of metrics defined in an application-specific way." ABOUT ENVISION (ENVISION WEBSITE): "Central to Envision, and conceived at the s	*	*	*
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp ?	None identified	*	*	*
Biophysical Context	No additional description provided	*	*	*
EM Scenario Drivers em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp ?	Alternative future land management strategies (status quo, managed growth, unmanaged growth)	*	*	*

EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run em.detail.methodOrAppHelp ?	Method + Application (multiple runs exist)	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application	Model Run Associated with a Specific EM Application
New or Pre-existing EM? em.detail.newOrExistHelp ?	Application of existing model	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy

Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Document ID for related EM em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp ?	Doc-314 \| Doc-47 ? Comment: Doc 314 is a secondary source. It is a webpage guide intended to provide support for developing an application using ENVISION.	Doc-314	Doc-314	Doc-314
EM ID for related EM em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp ?	EM-12 \| EM-333	None	None	None

EM Modeling Approach

EM Relationship to Time (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
EM Temporal Extent em.detail.tempExtentHelp ?	2000-2060	*	*	*
EM Time Dependence em.detail.timeDependencyHelp ?	time-dependent	*	*	*
EM Time Reference (Future/Past) em.detail.futurePastHelp ?	future time	*	*	*
EM Time Continuity em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp ?	discrete	*	*	*
EM Temporal Grain Size Value em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp ?	1	*	*	*
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp ?	Year	*	*	*

EM spatial extent (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Bounding Type em.detail.boundingTypeHelp ?	Watershed/Catchment/HUC	*	*	*
Spatial Extent Name em.detail.extentNameHelp ?	Puget Sound watershed	*	*	*
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude) em.detail.extentAreaHelp ?	10,000-100,000 km^2	*	*	*

Spatial Distribution of Computations (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
EM Spatial Distribution em.detail.distributeLumpHelp ?	spatially distributed (in at least some cases)	*	*	*
Spatial Grain Type em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp ?	Irregular	*	*	*
Spatial Grain Size em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp ?	Varies	*	*	*

EM Structure and Computation Approach (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
EM Computational Approach em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp ?	Numeric	*	*	*
EM Determinism em.detail.deterStochHelp ?	deterministic	*	*	*
Statistical Estimation of EM em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp ?	Conventional (frequentist) statistics	*	*	*

Model Checking Procedures Used (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Model Calibration Reported? em.detail.calibrationHelp ?	Unclear	*	*	*
Model Goodness of Fit Reported? em.detail.goodnessFitHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Goodness of Fit (metric\| value \| unit) em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp ?	None	*	*	*
Model Operational Validation Reported? em.detail.validationHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported? em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported? em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions? em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*

EM Locations, Environments, Ecology

Location of EM Application (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])

EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
North America United States Washington	*	*	*

Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)

EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Temperate North Pacific Northeast Pacific Cold Temperate Northeast Pacific Oregon, Washington, Vancouver Coast and Shelf	*	*	*

Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Centroid Latitude em.detail.ddLatHelp ?	47.58	*	*	*
Centroid Longitude em.detail.ddLongHelp ?	-122.32	*	*	*
Centroid Datum em.detail.datumHelp ?	WGS84	*	*	*
Centroid Coordinates Status em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp ?	Estimated	*	*	*

Environments and Scales Modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
EM Environmental Sub-Class em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp ?	Aquatic Environment (sub-classes not fully specified) \| Near Coastal Marine and Estuarine \| Terrestrial Environment (sub-classes not fully specified)	*	*	*
Specific Environment Type em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp ?	Pacific NW US region, coastal to montane, urban to rural	*	*	*
EM Ecological Scale em.detail.ecoScaleHelp ?	Ecological scale is finer than that of the Environmental Sub-class	*	*	*

Organisms modeled (* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left)

Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
EM Organismal Scale em.detail.orgScaleHelp ?	Not applicable	*	*	*

Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified

EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
None Available	*	*	*

EnviroAtlas URL

EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Dasymetric Allocation of Population, GAP Ecological Systems, Stream Length, Percent GAP Status 1 & 2, Acres of Land Enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD), Percent Impervious Area	None Available	None Available	None Available

EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system

* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left

CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)

EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
None	*	*	*

National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS) Plus

(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)

EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
None	*	*	*

EM Variable Names (and Units)

* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.

To view run information for variables, select any variable below or view run data for all variables.

Predictor

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Driving Variables (and Units) em.detail.drivingVariableHelp ?	Active railroads location (Not applicable) Agent values (unitless) Armoring length (m) Block group population density (People acre^-1) Coastline location (Not applicable) Conservation lands location (Not applicable) County FIPS code (Not applicable) County level medium growth population estimate (Not reported) Development class (code for policies) (Not applicable) Herring spawning areas location (nearshore) (Not applicable) In 100-yr floodplain (y/n) (Not applicable) In 200ft shoreline zone (y/n) (Not applicable) In Puget Sound viewshed (y/n) (Not applicable) In incorporated area (y/n) (Not applicable) In urban growth area (y/n) (Not applicable) Inactive railroads location (Not applicable) Land use/land cover class (Not applicable) Nearshore historic wetlands location (Not applicable) Nearshore slope stability (landslide hazards) (Not applicable) Nearshore wetlands location (Not applicable) Over water structures location (Not applicable) Owner type (Not applicable) Percent impervious area (%) Policy class (Not applicable) Regional growth centers location (Not applicable) Roads location (Not applicable) Shoreform type (current) (Not applicable) Shoreform type (historical) (Not applicable) Streams location (Not applicable) Sub-basin ID (Not applicable) Tidal barriers length (m)	Active railroads location (Not applicable) Agent values (unitless) Armoring length (m) Block group population density (People acre^-1) Coastline location (Not applicable) Conservation lands location (Not applicable) County FIPS code (Not applicable) County level medium growth population estimate (Not reported) Development class (code for policies) (Not applicable) Herring spawning areas location (nearshore) (Not applicable) In 100-yr floodplain (y/n) (Not applicable) In 200ft shoreline zone (y/n) (Not applicable) In Puget Sound viewshed (y/n) (Not applicable) In incorporated area (y/n) (Not applicable) In urban growth area (y/n) (Not applicable) Inactive railroads location (Not applicable) Land use/land cover class (Not applicable) Nearshore historic wetlands location (Not applicable) Nearshore slope stability (landslide hazards) (Not applicable) Nearshore wetlands location (Not applicable) Over water structures location (Not applicable) Owner type (Not applicable) Percent impervious area (%) Policy class (Not applicable) Regional growth centers location (Not applicable) Roads location (Not applicable) Shoreform type (current) (Not applicable) Shoreform type (historical) (Not applicable) Streams location (Not applicable) Sub-basin ID (Not applicable) Tidal barriers length (m)	Active railroads location (Not applicable) Agent values (unitless) Armoring length (m) Block group population density (People acre^-1) Coastline location (Not applicable) Conservation lands location (Not applicable) County FIPS code (Not applicable) County level medium growth population estimate (Not reported) Development class (code for policies) (Not applicable) Herring spawning areas location (nearshore) (Not applicable) In 100-yr floodplain (y/n) (Not applicable) In 200ft shoreline zone (y/n) (Not applicable) In Puget Sound viewshed (y/n) (Not applicable) In incorporated area (y/n) (Not applicable) In urban growth area (y/n) (Not applicable) Inactive railroads location (Not applicable) Land use/land cover class (Not applicable) Nearshore historic wetlands location (Not applicable) Nearshore slope stability (landslide hazards) (Not applicable) Nearshore wetlands location (Not applicable) Over water structures location (Not applicable) Owner type (Not applicable) Percent impervious area (%) Policy class (Not applicable) Regional growth centers location (Not applicable) Roads location (Not applicable) Shoreform type (current) (Not applicable) Shoreform type (historical) (Not applicable) Sub-basin ID (Not applicable) Tidal barriers length (m) streams location (Not applicable)	Active railroads location (Not applicable) Agent values (unitless) Armoring length (m) Block group population density (People acre^-1) Coastline location (m) Conservation lands location (Not applicable) County FIPS code (Not applicable) County level medium growth population estimate (Not reported) Development class (code for policies) (Not applicable) Herring spawning areas location (nearshore) (Not applicable) In 100-yr floodplain (y/n) (Not applicable) In 200ft shoreline zone (y/n) (Not applicable) In Puget Sound viewshed (y/n) (Not applicable) In incorporated area (y/n) (Not applicable) In urban growth area (y/n) (Not applicable) Inactive railroads location (Not applicable) Land use/land cover class (Not applicable) Nearshore historic wetlands location (Not applicable) Nearshore slope stability (landslide hazards) (Not applicable) Nearshore wetlands location (Not applicable) Over water structures location (Not applicable) Owner type (Not applicable) Percent impervious area (%) Policy class (Not applicable) Regional growth centers location (Not applicable) Roads location (Not applicable) Shoreform type (current) (Not applicable) Shoreform type (historical) (Not applicable) Sub-basin ID (Not applicable) Tidal barriers length (m) streams location (m)
Constant or Factor Variables (and Units) em.detail.constantFactorVariableHelp ?	LULC weight (unitless) Policy global constraint annual maintenance cost ($) Policy global constraint initial cost ($) Policy goal effectiveness score (unitless) Policy is exclusive (y/n) (Not applicable) Policy is mandatory (y/n) (Not applicable) Policy modifiers (unitless) Policy outcome (Not applicable) Policy site attributes (Not applicable) Policy start/end date (Not applicable)	LULC weight (unitless) Policy global constraint annual maintenance cost ($) Policy global constraint initial cost ($) Policy goal effectiveness score (unitless) Policy is exclusive (y/n) (Not applicable) Policy is mandatory (y/n) (Not applicable) Policy modifiers (unitless) Policy outcome (Not applicable) Policy site attributes (Not applicable) Policy start/end date (Not applicable)	LULC weight (unitless) Policy global constraint annual maintenance cost ($) Policy global constraint initial cost ($) Policy goal effectiveness score (unitless) Policy is exclusive (y/n) (Not applicable) Policy is mandatory (y/n) (Not applicable) Policy modifiers (unitless) Policy outcome (Not applicable) Policy site attributes (Not applicable) Policy start/end date (Not applicable)	LULC weight (unitless) Policy global constraint annual maintenance cost ($) Policy global constraint initial cost ($) Policy goal effectiveness score (unitless) Policy is exclusive (y/n) (Not applicable) Policy is mandatory (y/n) (Not applicable) Policy modifiers (unitless) Policy outcome (Not applicable) Policy site attributes (Not applicable) Policy start/end date (Not applicable)

Intermediate

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units) em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp ?	Distance to regional growth centers (m) Dock area (m^2) Individual decision unit (IDU) level population (Not reported) Marina area (m^2) Number of bridges (No.) Number of buoys (No.) Number of docks (No.) Number of marinas (No.) Number of other over water structures (No.) Population growth rate (people/km^2/yr)	Distance to regional growth centers (m) Dock area (m^2) Individual decision unit (IDU) level population (Not reported) Marina area (m^2) Number of bridges (No.) Number of buoys (No.) Number of docks (No.) Number of marinas (No.) Number of other over water structures (No.) Population growth rate (people/km^2/yr)	Distance to regional growth centers (m) Dock area (m^2) Individual decision unit (IDU) level population (Not reported) Marina area (m^2) Number of bridges (No.) Number of buoys (No.) Number of docks (No.) Number of marinas (No.) Number of other over water structures (No.) Population growth rate (people/km^2/yr)	Distance to regional growth centers (m) Dock area (m^2) Individual decision unit (IDU) level population (Not reported) Marina area (m^2) Number of bridges (No.) Number of buoys (No.) Number of docks (No.) Number of marinas (No.) Number of other over water structures (No.) Population growth rate (people/km^2/yr)

Response

EM ID em.detail.idHelp ?	EM-369	Model Run for: Status quo future land management strategy	Model Run for: Unmanaged growth future land management strategy	Model Run for: Managed growth future land management strategy
Observed Response Variables (and Units) em.detail.observedResponseHelp ?	None	*	*	*
Computed Response Variables (and Units) em.detail.computedResponseHelp ?	Land use/land cover (basin-wide) (Not applicable) Number of docks (basin-wide) (No.) Number of docks (sub-basin level) (No.) Number of marinas (basin-wide) (No.) Number of marinas (sub-basin level) (No.) Percent armoring (basin-wide) (%) Percent armoring (sub-basin level) (%) Percent growth capacity outside UGAs (%) Percent growth capacity within UGAs (%) Percent impervious surfaces (%) Percent impervious surfaces (basin-wide) (%) Percent impervious surfaces (sub-basin level) (%) Percent impervious surfaces density (basin-wide) (%) Percent nearshore growth capacity outside UGAs (%) Percent nearshore growth capacity within UGAs (%) Percent nearshore land use/land cover classes (basin-wide) (%) Percent nearshore land use/land cover classes (sub-basin level) (%) Percent new development outside UGA (%) Percent new development within UGA (%) Percent new high-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new high-density development within UGA (%) Percent new low-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new low-density development within UGA (%) Percent new medium-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new medium-density development within UGA (%) Percent of capacity available for new growth (basin-wide) (%) Percent of capacity available for new growth (sub-basin level) (%) Percent of new development inside UGAs (basin-wide) (%) Percent of new development inside UGAs (sub-basin level) (%) Percent resource lands (%) Population density growth (basin-wide years 2000-2060) (People acre^-1 60 years^-1)	Land use/land cover class (basin-wide) (Not applicable) Number of docks (basin-wide) (No.) Number of docks (sub-basin level) (No.) Number of marinas (basin-wide) (No.) Number of marinas (sub-basin level) (No.) Percent armoring (basin-wide) (%) Percent armoring (sub-basin level) (%) Percent growth capacity outside UGAs (%) Percent growth capacity within UGAs (%) Percent impervious surfaces (%) Percent impervious surfaces (basin-wide) (%) Percent impervious surfaces (sub-basin level) (%) Percent impervious surfaces density (basin-wide) (%) Percent nearshore growth capacity outside UGAs (%) Percent nearshore growth capacity within UGAs (%) Percent nearshore land use/land cover classes (basin-wide) (%) Percent nearshore land use/land cover classes (sub-basin level) (%) Percent new development outside UGA (%) Percent new development within UGA (%) Percent new high-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new high-density development within UGA (%) Percent new low-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new low-density development within UGA (%) Percent new medium-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new medium-density development within UGA (%) Percent of capacity available for new growth (basin-wide) (%) Percent of capacity available for new growth (sub-basin level) (%) Percent of new development inside UGAs (basin-wide) (%) Percent of new development inside UGAs (sub-basin level) (%) Percent resource lands (%) Population density growth (basin-wide years 2000-2060) (People acre^-1)	Land use/land cover class (basin-wide) (Not applicable) Number of docks (basin-wide) (No.) Number of docks (sub-basin level) (No.) Number of marinas (basin-wide) (No.) Number of marinas (sub-basin level) (No.) Percent armoring (basin-wide) (%) Percent armoring (sub-basin level) (%) Percent growth capacity outside UGAs (%) Percent growth capacity within UGAs (%) Percent impervious surfaces (%) Percent impervious surfaces (basin-wide) (%) Percent impervious surfaces (sub-basin level) (%) Percent impervious surfaces density (basin-wide) (%) Percent nearshore growth capacity outside UGAs (%) Percent nearshore growth capacity within UGAs (%) Percent nearshore land use/land cover classes (basin-wide) (%) Percent nearshore land use/land cover classes (sub-basin level) (%) Percent new development outside UGA (%) Percent new development within UGA (%) Percent new high-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new high-density development within UGA (%) Percent new low-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new low-density development within UGA (%) Percent new medium-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new medium-density development within UGA (%) Percent of capacity available for new growth (basin-wide) (%) Percent of capacity available for new growth (sub-basin level) (%) Percent of new development inside UGAs (basin-wide) (%) Percent of new development inside UGAs (sub-basin level) (%) Percent resource lands (%) Population density growth (basin-wide years 2000-2060) (People acre^-1 60 years^-1)	Land use/land cover class (basin-wide) (Not applicable) Number of docks (basin-wide) (No.) Number of docks (sub-basin level) (No.) Number of marinas (basin-wide) (No.) Number of marinas (sub-basin level) (No.) Percent armoring (basin-wide) (%) Percent armoring (sub-basin level) (%) Percent growth capacity outside UGAs (%) Percent growth capacity within UGAs (%) Percent impervious surfaces (%) Percent impervious surfaces (basin-wide) (%) Percent impervious surfaces (sub-basin level) (%) Percent impervious surfaces density (basin-wide) (%) Percent nearshore growth capacity outside UGAs (%) Percent nearshore growth capacity within UGAs (%) Percent nearshore land use/land cover classes (basin-wide) (%) Percent nearshore land use/land cover classes (sub-basin level) (%) Percent new development outside UGA (%) Percent new development within UGA (%) Percent new high-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new high-density development within UGA (%) Percent new low-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new low-density development within UGA (%) Percent new medium-density development outside UGA (%) Percent new medium-density development within UGA (%) Percent of capacity available for new growth (basin-wide) (%) Percent of capacity available for new growth (sub-basin level) (%) Percent of new development inside UGAs (basin-wide) (%) Percent of new development inside UGAs (sub-basin level) (%) Percent resource lands (%) Population density growth (basin-wide years 2000-2060) (People acre^-1)

US EPA

EcoService Models Library (ESML)

View Runs

: Envision, Puget Sound, WA, USA (EM-369)

EM Identity and Description

Comment:

Comment:

Comment:

Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML

Comment:

EM Modeling Approach

EM Locations, Environments, Ecology

Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])

Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)

Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)

Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled

Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified

EnviroAtlas URL

EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system

* Note that run information is shown only where run data differ from the "parent" entry shown at left

CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)

National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS) Plus

(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)

EM Variable Names (and Units)

* Note that for runs, variable name is displayed only where data for that variable differed by run AND those differences were reported in the source document. Where differences occurred but were not reported, the variable is not listed. Click on variable name to view details.

Predictor

Intermediate

Response