EcoService Models Library (ESML)
loading
EM: US EPA EnviroAtlas - Percent potentially restorable wetlands, USA (EM-492)
Collapse All
Expand All
- Export Data to Spreadsheet (Free Viewers)
- View Variable Relationship Diagram (PDF)(1 pp, 80 KB, About PDF)
EM Identity and Description
EM Identification
EM ID
em.detail.idHelp
?
|
EM-492 |
EM Short Name
em.detail.shortNameHelp
?
|
EnviroAtlas - Restorable wetlands |
EM Full Name
em.detail.fullNameHelp
?
|
US EPA EnviroAtlas - Percent potentially restorable wetlands, USA |
EM Source or Collection
em.detail.emSourceOrCollectionHelp
?
|
US EPA | EnviroAtlas |
EM Source Document ID
|
262 |
Document Author
em.detail.documentAuthorHelp
?
|
US EPA Office of Research and Development - National Exposure Research Laboratory |
Document Year
em.detail.documentYearHelp
?
|
2013 |
Document Title
em.detail.sourceIdHelp
?
|
EnviroAtlas - National |
Document Status
em.detail.statusCategoryHelp
?
|
Peer reviewed and published |
Comments on Status
em.detail.commentsOnStatusHelp
?
|
Published on US EPA EnviroAtlas website |
Software and Access
https://www.epa.gov/enviroatlas | |
Contact Name
em.detail.contactNameHelp
?
|
EnviroAtlas Team |
Contact Address
|
Not reported |
Contact Email
|
enviroatlas@epa.gov |
EM Description
Summary Description
em.detail.summaryDescriptionHelp
?
|
DATA FACT SHEET: "This EnviroAtlas national map depicts the percent potentially restorable wetlands within each subwatershed (12-digit HUC) in the U.S. Potentially restorable wetlands are defined as agricultural areas that naturally accumulate water and contain some proportion of poorly-drained soils. The EnviroAtlas Team produced this dataset by combining three data layers - land cover, digital elevation, and soil drainage information." "To map potentially restorable wetlands, 2006 National Land Cover Data (NLCD) classes pasture/hay and cultivated crops were reclassified as potentially suitable and all other landcover classes as unsuitable. Poorly- and very poorly drained soils were identified using Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey information mainly from the higher resolution Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database. The two poorly drained soil classes, expressed as percentage of a polygon in the soil survey, were combined to create a raster layer. A wetness index or Composite Topographic Index (CTI) was developed to identify areas wet enough to create wetlands. The wetness index grid, calculated from National Elevation Data (NED), relates upstream contributing area and slope to overland flow. Results from previous studies suggested that CTI values ≥ 550 captured the majority of wetlands. The three layers, when combined, resulted in four classes: unsuitable, low, moderate, and high wetland restoration potential. Areas with high potential for restorable wetlands have suitable landcover (crop/pasture), CTI values ≥ 550, and 80–100% poorly- or very poorly drained soils (PVP). Areas with moderate potential have suitable landcover, CTI values ≥ 550, and 1–79% PVP. Areas with low potential meet the landcover and 80–100% PVP criteria, but do not have CTI values ≥ 550 to corroborate wetness. All other areas were classed as unsuitable. The percentage of total land within each 12-digit HUC that is covered by potentially restorable wetlands was estimated and displayed in five classes for this map." |
Specific Policy or Decision Context Cited
em.detail.policyDecisionContextHelp
?
|
None Identified |
Biophysical Context
|
No additional description provided |
EM Scenario Drivers
em.detail.scenarioDriverHelp
?
|
No scenarios presented |
EM Relationship to Other EMs or Applications
Method Only, Application of Method or Model Run
em.detail.methodOrAppHelp
?
|
Method + Application |
New or Pre-existing EM?
em.detail.newOrExistHelp
?
|
New or revised model |
Related EMs (for example, other versions or derivations of this EM) described in ESML
em.detail.relatedEmHelp
?
Document ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmDocumentIdHelp
?
|
None |
EM ID for related EM
em.detail.relatedEmEmIdHelp
?
|
None |
EM Modeling Approach
EM Relationship to Time
EM Temporal Extent
em.detail.tempExtentHelp
?
|
2006-2013 |
EM Time Dependence
em.detail.timeDependencyHelp
?
|
time-stationary |
EM Time Reference (Future/Past)
em.detail.futurePastHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Time Continuity
em.detail.continueDiscreteHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Temporal Grain Size Value
em.detail.tempGrainSizeHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Temporal Grain Size Unit
em.detail.tempGrainSizeUnitHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Spatial Extent
Bounding Type
em.detail.boundingTypeHelp
?
|
Geopolitical |
Spatial Extent Name
em.detail.extentNameHelp
?
|
conterminous United States |
Spatial Extent Area (Magnitude)
em.detail.extentAreaHelp
?
|
>1,000,000 km^2 |
Spatial Distribution of Computations
EM Spatial Distribution
em.detail.distributeLumpHelp
?
|
spatially distributed (in at least some cases) |
Spatial Grain Type
em.detail.spGrainTypeHelp
?
|
other (specify), for irregular (e.g., stream reach, lake basin) |
Spatial Grain Size
em.detail.spGrainSizeHelp
?
|
irregular |
EM Structure and Computation Approach
EM Computational Approach
em.detail.emComputationalApproachHelp
?
|
Analytic |
EM Determinism
em.detail.deterStochHelp
?
|
deterministic |
Statistical Estimation of EM
em.detail.statisticalEstimationHelp
?
|
|
Model Checking Procedures Used
Model Calibration Reported?
em.detail.calibrationHelp
?
|
No |
Model Goodness of Fit Reported?
em.detail.goodnessFitHelp
?
|
No |
Goodness of Fit (metric| value | unit)
em.detail.goodnessFitValuesHelp
?
|
None |
Model Operational Validation Reported?
em.detail.validationHelp
?
|
No |
Model Uncertainty Analysis Reported?
em.detail.uncertaintyAnalysisHelp
?
|
No |
Model Sensitivity Analysis Reported?
em.detail.sensAnalysisHelp
?
|
No |
Model Sensitivity Analysis Include Interactions?
em.detail.interactionConsiderHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
EM Locations, Environments, Ecology
Location of EM Application
Terrestrial location (Classification hierarchy: Continent > Country > U.S. State [United States only])
em.detail.relationToSpaceTerrestrialHelp
?
|
Marine location (Classification hierarchy: Realm > Region > Province > Ecoregion)
em.detail.relationToSpaceMarineHelp
?
None |
Centroid Lat/Long (Decimal Degree)
Centroid Latitude
em.detail.ddLatHelp
?
|
39.5 |
Centroid Longitude
em.detail.ddLongHelp
?
|
-98.35 |
Centroid Datum
em.detail.datumHelp
?
|
WGS84 |
Centroid Coordinates Status
em.detail.coordinateStatusHelp
?
|
Estimated |
Environments and Scales Modeled
EM Environmental Sub-Class
em.detail.emEnvironmentalSubclassHelp
?
|
Agroecosystems |
Specific Environment Type
em.detail.specificEnvTypeHelp
?
|
Terrestrial |
EM Ecological Scale
em.detail.ecoScaleHelp
?
|
Ecological scale is finer than that of the Environmental Sub-class |
Scale and taxa of organisms modeled
Scale of differentiation of organisms modeled
em.detail.nameOfOrgsOrGroupsHelp
?
EM Organismal Scale
em.detail.orgScaleHelp
?
|
Not applicable |
Taxonomic level and name of organisms or groups identified
taxonomyHelp
?
None Available |
EnviroAtlas URL
em.detail.enviroAtlasURLHelp
?
GAP Ecological Systems, The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) |
EM Ecosystem Goods and Services (EGS) potentially modeled, by classification system
CICES v 4.3 - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (Section > Division > Group > Class)
em.detail.cicesHelp
?
None |
(Environmental Subclass > Ecological End-Product (EEP) > EEP Subclass > EEP Modifier)
fegs2Help
?
None |
EM Variable Names (and Units)
Predictor
em.detail.variablesPredictorHelp
?
Driving Variables (and Units)
view details (5 variables)
em.detail.drivingVariableHelp
?
|
|
Constant or Factor Variables (and Units)
view details (1 variable)
em.detail.constantFactorVariableHelp
?
|
Intermediate
Intermediate (Computed) Variables (and Units)
view details (2 variables)
em.detail.intermediateVariableHelp
?
|
Response
em.detail.variablesResponseHelp
?
Observed Response Variables (and Units)
em.detail.observedResponseHelp
?
|
None |
Computed Response Variables (and Units)
view details (1 variable)
em.detail.computedResponseHelp
?
|